http://www.impactlab.net/2006/02/15/remote-control-heart-attack-weapons/
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
in: Science & Technology News
The brain is on the verge of becoming the next battlefield with weaponscurrently being designed to hack directly into your nervous system.
"Controlled Personnel Effects"(see image, right) is one of the Air Force’s ambitious long-termchallenges. It starts with better and more accurate bombs, but moves onto discuss devices that "make selected adversaries think or actaccording to our needs… By studying and modeling the human brain andnervous system, the ability to mentally influence or confuse personnelis also possible."
Thefirst stage is technology to “remotely create physical sensations.”They give the example of the Active Denial System "people zapper" whichuses a high-frequency radiation similar to microwaves as a non-lethalmeans of crowd control.
Other weapons can affect the nervous system directly. The Pulsed Energy Projectilefires a short intense pulse of laser energy. This vaporizes the outerlayer of the target, creating a rapidly-expanding expanding ball ofplasma. At different power levels, those expanding plasmas coulddeliver a harmless warning, stun the target, or disable them – all withpinpoint laser precision from a mile away.
Early reports on the effects of PEPsmentioned temporary paralysis, then thought to be related to ultrasonicshockwaves. It later became apparent that the electromagnetic pulsecaused by the expanding plasma was triggering nerve cells.
Details of this emerged in a heavily-censored document released to Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Projectunder the Freedom if Information Act. Called “Sensory consequence ofelectromagnetic pulsed emitted by laser induced plasmas,” it describedresearch on activating the nerve cells responsible for sensingunpleasant stimuli: heat, damage, pressure, cold. By selectivelystimulating a particular nociceptor, a finely tuned PEP mightsensations of say, being burned, frozen or dipped in acid — allwithout doing the slightest actual harm.
Friday, August 6, 2010
School district spied on students at home as they slept: lawsuit
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0416/school-spied-students-slept/
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Lawsuit: School administrator 'may be a voyeur' who spied on kids for personal gratification
A Philadelphia-area school district secretly took "thousands" of webcam photos of students in their homes and tracked their Web site visits and parts of online chats through spy software installed on the students' school-issued laptops, a Pennsylvania court heard yesterday.
In February, the family of Blake Robbins, a student at Harriton High School in Rosemont, sued the Lower Merion School District after the district admitted to them it had been spying on students via a remote-activated feature on the laptops it issued to all its 2,300 high school pupils.
In a motion filed in court on Thursday, Robbins' lawyers asserted that the school district had taken at least 400 snapshots of 15-year-old Robbins, including some of him sleeping. The motion also stated that "thousands of webcam pictures and screen shots have been taken of numerous other students in their homes," the Philadelphia Inquirer reports.
And in a strange twist to the story, the lawyers also suggested that Carol Cafiero, one of two school administrators with access to the spying technology, "may be a voyeur" who spied on students for her personal gratification, as some of the images taken by the laptops may have ended up on her personal computer.
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Lawsuit: School administrator 'may be a voyeur' who spied on kids for personal gratification
A Philadelphia-area school district secretly took "thousands" of webcam photos of students in their homes and tracked their Web site visits and parts of online chats through spy software installed on the students' school-issued laptops, a Pennsylvania court heard yesterday.
In February, the family of Blake Robbins, a student at Harriton High School in Rosemont, sued the Lower Merion School District after the district admitted to them it had been spying on students via a remote-activated feature on the laptops it issued to all its 2,300 high school pupils.
In a motion filed in court on Thursday, Robbins' lawyers asserted that the school district had taken at least 400 snapshots of 15-year-old Robbins, including some of him sleeping. The motion also stated that "thousands of webcam pictures and screen shots have been taken of numerous other students in their homes," the Philadelphia Inquirer reports.
And in a strange twist to the story, the lawyers also suggested that Carol Cafiero, one of two school administrators with access to the spying technology, "may be a voyeur" who spied on students for her personal gratification, as some of the images taken by the laptops may have ended up on her personal computer.
FORCED DRUGGING OF AMERICAN CHILDREN - CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/drugging_children.htm
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
The Psycho State: by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
http://www.house.gov/paul/mail/welcome.htm
A presidential initiative called The “New Freedom Commission on Mental Health” has issued a report recommending forced mental health screening for every child in America, including preschool children. The goal is to promote the patently false idea that we have a nation of children with undiagnosed mental disorders crying out for treatment.One obvious beneficiary of the proposal is the pharmaceutical industry, which is eager to sell the psychotropic drugs that undoubtedly will be prescribed to millions of American schoolchildren under the new screening program. Of course a tiny minority of children suffer from legitimate mental illnesses, but the widespread use of Ritalin and other drugs on youngsters who simply exhibit typical rambunctious, fidgety, and impatient behavior is nothing short of criminal. It may be easier to teach and parent drugged kids, but convenience is no justification for endangering them. Children’s brains are still developing, and the truth is we have no idea what the long-term side effects of psychiatric drugs may be. Medical science has not even exhaustively identified every possible brain chemical, even as we alter those chemicals with drugs.Dr. Karen Effrem, a physician who strongly opposes mandatory mental health screening, warns us that “America’s children should not be medicated by expensive, ineffective, and dangerous medications based on vague and dubious diagnoses.” She points out that psychiatric diagnoses are inherently subjective, as authors of the diagnostic manuals admit. She also is concerned that mental health screening could be used to label children whose attitudes, religious beliefs, and political views conflict with the secular orthodoxy that dominates our schools.The greater issue, however, is not whether youth mental health screening is appropriate. The real issue is whether the state owns your kids. When the government orders “universal” mental health screening in schools, it really means “mandatory.” Parents, children, and their private doctors should decide whether a child has mental health problems, not government bureaucrats. That this even needs to be stated is a sign of just how obedient our society has become toward government. What kind of free people would turn their children’s most intimate health matters over to government strangers? How in the world have we allowed government to become so powerful and arrogant that it assumes it can force children to accept psychiatric treatment whether parents object or not?Parents must do everything possible to retain responsibility and control over their children’s well-being. There is no end to the bureaucratic appetite to rule every aspect of our lives, including how we raise our children. Forced mental health screening is just the latest of many state usurpations of parental authority: compulsory education laws, politically-correct school curricula, mandatory vaccines, and interference with discipline through phony “social services” agencies all represent assaults on families. The political right has now joined the political left in seeking the de facto nationalization of children, and only informed resistance by parents can stop it. The federal government is slowly but surely destroying real families, but it is hardly a benevolent surrogate parent.
September 14, 2004
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.Ron Paul Archives
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
The Psycho State: by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
http://www.house.gov/paul/mail/welcome.htm
A presidential initiative called The “New Freedom Commission on Mental Health” has issued a report recommending forced mental health screening for every child in America, including preschool children. The goal is to promote the patently false idea that we have a nation of children with undiagnosed mental disorders crying out for treatment.One obvious beneficiary of the proposal is the pharmaceutical industry, which is eager to sell the psychotropic drugs that undoubtedly will be prescribed to millions of American schoolchildren under the new screening program. Of course a tiny minority of children suffer from legitimate mental illnesses, but the widespread use of Ritalin and other drugs on youngsters who simply exhibit typical rambunctious, fidgety, and impatient behavior is nothing short of criminal. It may be easier to teach and parent drugged kids, but convenience is no justification for endangering them. Children’s brains are still developing, and the truth is we have no idea what the long-term side effects of psychiatric drugs may be. Medical science has not even exhaustively identified every possible brain chemical, even as we alter those chemicals with drugs.Dr. Karen Effrem, a physician who strongly opposes mandatory mental health screening, warns us that “America’s children should not be medicated by expensive, ineffective, and dangerous medications based on vague and dubious diagnoses.” She points out that psychiatric diagnoses are inherently subjective, as authors of the diagnostic manuals admit. She also is concerned that mental health screening could be used to label children whose attitudes, religious beliefs, and political views conflict with the secular orthodoxy that dominates our schools.The greater issue, however, is not whether youth mental health screening is appropriate. The real issue is whether the state owns your kids. When the government orders “universal” mental health screening in schools, it really means “mandatory.” Parents, children, and their private doctors should decide whether a child has mental health problems, not government bureaucrats. That this even needs to be stated is a sign of just how obedient our society has become toward government. What kind of free people would turn their children’s most intimate health matters over to government strangers? How in the world have we allowed government to become so powerful and arrogant that it assumes it can force children to accept psychiatric treatment whether parents object or not?Parents must do everything possible to retain responsibility and control over their children’s well-being. There is no end to the bureaucratic appetite to rule every aspect of our lives, including how we raise our children. Forced mental health screening is just the latest of many state usurpations of parental authority: compulsory education laws, politically-correct school curricula, mandatory vaccines, and interference with discipline through phony “social services” agencies all represent assaults on families. The political right has now joined the political left in seeking the de facto nationalization of children, and only informed resistance by parents can stop it. The federal government is slowly but surely destroying real families, but it is hardly a benevolent surrogate parent.
September 14, 2004
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.Ron Paul Archives
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html
WE ARE ALL MENTALLY ILL - JUST ASK THE NEW PSYCHIATRIC MANUAL FOR DIAGNOSING NEW MENTAL ILLNESSES
http://www.cchrint.org/2010/07/28/the-bbc%e2%80%94new-report-challenges-psychiatrys-billing-bible-the-dsm%e2%80%94mental-health-are-we-all-sick-now/
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Mental health: are we all sick now?
BBC NewsBy Philippa RoxbyJuly 28, 2010
Diagnosing psychiatric illness has always been controversial, mental health experts say. Now some are worried that a new draft of the diagnostic ‘bible’ for mental health medicine could result in almost everyone being diagnosed with a mental condition.
The diagnostic ‘bible’ in question is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association.
The US manual is used worldwide as a basis for diagnosis, research and medical education.
Its forthcoming fifth edition – known in the profession as as DSM-5 – is set to contain a range of new diagnoses, including conditions such as “mixed anxiety depression, psychosis risk syndrome and temper dysregulation disorder”, as well as the more mundane binge eating.
The danger, say experts writing in a special issue of the Journal of Mental Health, is that there has not been enough research to back up these changes.
Even the smallest shift in how to define something like depression could have huge implications.
Self-fulfilling
Dr Felicity Callard, senior research fellow at the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, says it is crucial to understand what happens when people are over-diagnosed.
“There are very big potential implications on how people, particularly adolescents, respond to being told they have a mental illness. It’s likely there will be harmful consequences,” she said.
She cites the “at risk psychosis syndrome” diagnosis as an example of a label which is given to young people who ‘might’ have psychosis – characterised by abrupt changes in personality. It is a diagnosis of something which could result in a disorder, but only potentially. That can have complicated effects, she says.
“Imagine a young person being told that they are “at risk” of developing a mental illness. How would that affect that individual’s behaviour? Could it lead to increased stigma or even discrimination? And how might it affect the parents and family of that person too?”
Jerome Wakefield of New York University’s Department of Psychiatry writes: “One of the most frightening scenarios is the potential for medicating people – particularly children – who haven’t yet shown any signs of illness in a bid to ‘treat’ them.”
These concerns are shared by a number of clinical experts in the Journal of Mental Health.
Read entire article here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10787342
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Mental health: are we all sick now?
BBC NewsBy Philippa RoxbyJuly 28, 2010
Diagnosing psychiatric illness has always been controversial, mental health experts say. Now some are worried that a new draft of the diagnostic ‘bible’ for mental health medicine could result in almost everyone being diagnosed with a mental condition.
The diagnostic ‘bible’ in question is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association.
The US manual is used worldwide as a basis for diagnosis, research and medical education.
Its forthcoming fifth edition – known in the profession as as DSM-5 – is set to contain a range of new diagnoses, including conditions such as “mixed anxiety depression, psychosis risk syndrome and temper dysregulation disorder”, as well as the more mundane binge eating.
The danger, say experts writing in a special issue of the Journal of Mental Health, is that there has not been enough research to back up these changes.
Even the smallest shift in how to define something like depression could have huge implications.
Self-fulfilling
Dr Felicity Callard, senior research fellow at the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, says it is crucial to understand what happens when people are over-diagnosed.
“There are very big potential implications on how people, particularly adolescents, respond to being told they have a mental illness. It’s likely there will be harmful consequences,” she said.
She cites the “at risk psychosis syndrome” diagnosis as an example of a label which is given to young people who ‘might’ have psychosis – characterised by abrupt changes in personality. It is a diagnosis of something which could result in a disorder, but only potentially. That can have complicated effects, she says.
“Imagine a young person being told that they are “at risk” of developing a mental illness. How would that affect that individual’s behaviour? Could it lead to increased stigma or even discrimination? And how might it affect the parents and family of that person too?”
Jerome Wakefield of New York University’s Department of Psychiatry writes: “One of the most frightening scenarios is the potential for medicating people – particularly children – who haven’t yet shown any signs of illness in a bid to ‘treat’ them.”
These concerns are shared by a number of clinical experts in the Journal of Mental Health.
Read entire article here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10787342
Psychiatry’s Billing Bible: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
http://www.cchrint.org/cchr-issues/dsm-billing-bible/
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
..The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is psychiatry’s billing bible of so-called mental disorders. With the DSM, psychiatry has taken countless aspects of human behavior and reclassified them as a mental illness simply by adding the term disorder onto them. While even key DSM contributors admit that there is no scientific/medical validity to the disorders, the DSM nonetheless serves as a diagnostic tool, not only for individual treatment, but also for child custody disputes, discrimination cases, court testimony, education and more.
The DSM is driven not by science, but instead caters to the pharmaceutical industry. With its expanding list of “mental disorders”—voted into existence, not discovered as in real medicine—for each of these a psychiatric drug can be prescribed and insurance companies billed. That big formula spells big profits for psychiatrists and drug companies. And this has been exposed more recently with a U.S. Senate Finance Committee investigation into the APA itself and the fact that about 56% of its $12 million-a-year income derives from drug makers (more below).
“The way to sell drugs is to sell psychiatric illness,” says Carl Elliot, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota.[1]
Kelly Patricia O’Meara, an award winning journalist and former Congressional staff points out, “Drug companies pull a mental disorder out of the DSM hat and get FDA approval to use an already existing drug to treat it. Well-known psychiatrists are enlisted to publicly affirm the disorder as a social problem…Voila! Confirmed psychiatric ill and magic pill.”[2]
Even within its own ranks there is disagreement about the drug company influence on the diagnostic process. An international poll of mental health experts conducted in 2001, voted DSM-IV one of the 10 worst psychiatric papers of the millennium.
Dr. Irwin Savodnik, an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California, Los Angeles, says: “The very vocabulary of psychiatry is now defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry.”
Studies Expose Conflicts of Interest
That became evident in the landmark study published in the journal of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics in 2006 that found that for more than half of the panel members that reviewed which disorders would be included in the fourth edition revision of DSM (1994), more than half had undisclosed financial links to Big Pharma. For the so-called mood disorders (“depression” and “bipolar”) and “schizophrenia/psychotic disorder,” 100% of the panel members had financial involvements with drug companies. Sales of the drugs prescribed for these (by virtue of their inclusion in the DSM) reach more than $80 billion worldwide.
Apparently the APA psychiatrists did not want to give up this cashcow. For the DSM-V revision, another study found that 18 of the 20 members overseeing the revision of clinical guidelines for treating just three “mental disorders” had financial ties to drug companies, with drug treatment for these disorders generate some $25 billion a year in pharmaceutical sales (U.S. alone).
Under such public criticism and a year after it had been under investigation by the Senate Finance Committee for its conflicts of interest in drug companies, in March 2009, the APA announced that it would phase out pharmaceutical funding of continuing medical education seminars and meals at its conventions. However, within two months, the APA accepted more than $1.7 million in pharmaceutical company funds for its annual conference, held in San Francisco.
Not surprising. In 2002, the APA’s Anand Pandya said that without pharmaceutical industry funds, membership dues could escalate 455% from $540 a year to $3,000. Pandya is president of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), which in 2009 as also asked to provide records of its pharmaceutical company funding to federal investigators.
Psychiatry’s 300% increase of mental disorders in the DSM over five decades has already generated billions of dollars in government funding. Since DSM-IV, there has been also been a 256% increase in psychiatric (antipsychotics and antidepressants) drug sales.
Just how far psychiatrists will go using the DSM to label people “disordered” is reflected in a recent survey conducted by Ronald Kessler, professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School. He relied upon the DSM to survey Americans and concluded that nearly every second one (48%) suffers from at least one mental illness during their lifetime.[3] A “DSM–IV personality disorders” survey that he conducted for the World Health Organization, the results of which were published in 2009, was heavily funded by Eli Lilly Foundation, Ortho-McNeil, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer. Kessler himself is a consultant for at least seven drug companies.
More to the point, as the late Dr. Sydney Walker III, a neurologist and psychiatrist, wrote: “Drug company money influences every aspect of modern-day psychiatry. The American Psychiatric Association is literally built on a foundation of drug money…In return, the APA bends over backward to help drug companies promote their products.”[4] “That influence,” he said, “has focused on expanding the number of ‘psychiatric disorders’ recognized by the APA, and the number of drug treatments recommended for these disorders. After all, every DSM ‘diagnosis,’ is a potential gold mine for pharmaceutical firms.”[5]
No Scientific Validity
As the diagnoses completely lack scientific criteria, anyone can be labeled mentally ill, and subjected to dangerous and life-threatening treatments based solely on opinion. The scientific validity of the DSM has come under increasing attack from medical professionals and scientific experts such as Herb Kutchins of California State University and Stuart A. Kirk of UCLA, and authors of Making Us Crazy: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders, determined that “…there is ample reason to conclude that the latest versions of DSM as a clinical tool are unreliable and therefore of questionable validity as a classification system.”
The late Loren Mosher, M.D., a Clinical Professor of Psychiatry who resigned from the APA because of its drug company influence, wrote: “DSM-IV has become a bible and a money making bestseller—its major failings notwithstanding. It confines and defines practice, some take it seriously, others more realistically.”
Further, “The issue is what do the categories [in DSM] tell us? Do they in fact accurately represent the person with a problem? They don’t, and can’t, because there are no external validating criteria for psychiatric diagnoses. There is neither a blood test nor specific anatomic lesions for any major psychiatric disorder.”
The internationally renowned professor of psychiatry emeritus Thomas Szasz, supports this point, writing: “There is no blood or other biological test to ascertain the presence of a mental illness, as there is for most bodily diseases. If such a test were developed, then the condition would cease to be a mental illness and would be classified, instead, as a symptom of a bodily disease.” So classified, it would make psychiatry redundant, and general physicians would replace it.
Therein lies the underlying problem of DSM—it isn’t a medical diagnostic system. Its all based on opinion—and faulty at best. Psychiatry lacked a system equivalent to that in medicine, and this contributed greatly to its poor reputation, both among medical professionals and the population as a whole. Thus it invented DSM to both convince real medicine of psychiatry’s legitimacy and to capture a slice of the insurance market. As Kutchins and Kirk point out, the evolution of the DSM is a “story of the struggles of the American Psychiatric Association to gain respectability within medicine and maintain dominance among the many mental health professionals.”[6]
Further, they assumed that if “a group of psychiatrists agree on a list of atypical [new] behaviors, the behaviors constitute a valid mental disorder. Using this approach, creating mental disorders can become a parlor game in which clusters of all kinds of behaviors (i.e. syndromes) can be added to the manual.” In fact, all DSM succeeds in doing is “to medicalize too many human troubles.”
Even psychiatrist Al Parides observes: “what they have done is medicalize many problems that don’t have demonstrable, biological causes.
Other Expert Quotes Show No Science to DSM
Jeffrey A. Schaler, Ph.D.: says its tantamount to fraud. “The notion of scientific validity…is related to fraud. Validity refers to the extent to which something represents or measures what it purports to represent or measure. When diagnostic measures do not represent what they purport to represent, we say that the measures lack validity. If a business transaction or trade rested on such a lack of validity, we might say that the lack of validity was instrumental in a commitment of fraud.”
Psychiatry has been unable to determine a single cause for a single mental disorder.
Dr. Harold Pincus, Vice Chairman of the DSM-IV task force admitted, “There has never been any criterion that psychiatric diagnoses require a demonstrated biological etiology (cause).”
Psychologist Renee Garfinkel, a staff member of the American Psychological Association, said of the DSM-III-R review committee: “The low level of intellectual effort was shocking. Diagnoses were developed by majority vote on the level we would use to choose a restaurant. You feel like Italian, I feel like Chinese, so let’s go to a cafeteria. Then it’s typed into the computer.”
J. Allan Hobson and Jonathan A. Leonard, authors of Out of Its Mind, Psychiatry in Crisis, A Call For Reform: “…DSM-IV’s authoritative status and detailed nature tends to promote the idea that rote diagnosis and pill-pushing are acceptable.”
Elliot S. Valenstein, biopsychologist, author of Blaming the Brain: “DSM-IV is not an exciting document. It is purely descriptive and presents no new scientific insights or any theories about what causes the many mental disorders it lists.”
The DSM-V review psychiatrists should take heed of Paul Genova, M.D., writing in Psychiatric Times, who said, the “DSM diagnostic system has outlived its usefulness by about two decades. It should be abandoned, not revised.”
[1] Shankar Vedantam, “Drug Ads Hyping Anxiety Make Some Uneasy,” The Washington Post, 16 July 2001.
[2] Kelly O’Meara, addressing CCHR 34th Anniversary and Human Rights Awards, Los Angeles, 2002.
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Comorbidity_Survey; http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/ncs/; http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/content/41/9/22.full?maxtoshow=&HITS=&hits=&RESULTFORMAT=1&andorexacttitle=and&titleabstract=ADHD+%2522social+status%2522+reward+dopamine&andorexacttitleabs=or&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=120&sortspec=relevan.
[4] Sydney Walker, III, M.D., A Dose of Sanity, ( John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1996), p. 229.
[5] Sydney Walker, III, M.D., A Dose of Sanity, ( John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1996), p. 230.
[6] Op. cit., Herb Kutchins, Stuart A. Kirk, Making Us Crazy, p. 22.
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
..The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is psychiatry’s billing bible of so-called mental disorders. With the DSM, psychiatry has taken countless aspects of human behavior and reclassified them as a mental illness simply by adding the term disorder onto them. While even key DSM contributors admit that there is no scientific/medical validity to the disorders, the DSM nonetheless serves as a diagnostic tool, not only for individual treatment, but also for child custody disputes, discrimination cases, court testimony, education and more.
The DSM is driven not by science, but instead caters to the pharmaceutical industry. With its expanding list of “mental disorders”—voted into existence, not discovered as in real medicine—for each of these a psychiatric drug can be prescribed and insurance companies billed. That big formula spells big profits for psychiatrists and drug companies. And this has been exposed more recently with a U.S. Senate Finance Committee investigation into the APA itself and the fact that about 56% of its $12 million-a-year income derives from drug makers (more below).
“The way to sell drugs is to sell psychiatric illness,” says Carl Elliot, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota.[1]
Kelly Patricia O’Meara, an award winning journalist and former Congressional staff points out, “Drug companies pull a mental disorder out of the DSM hat and get FDA approval to use an already existing drug to treat it. Well-known psychiatrists are enlisted to publicly affirm the disorder as a social problem…Voila! Confirmed psychiatric ill and magic pill.”[2]
Even within its own ranks there is disagreement about the drug company influence on the diagnostic process. An international poll of mental health experts conducted in 2001, voted DSM-IV one of the 10 worst psychiatric papers of the millennium.
Dr. Irwin Savodnik, an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California, Los Angeles, says: “The very vocabulary of psychiatry is now defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry.”
Studies Expose Conflicts of Interest
That became evident in the landmark study published in the journal of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics in 2006 that found that for more than half of the panel members that reviewed which disorders would be included in the fourth edition revision of DSM (1994), more than half had undisclosed financial links to Big Pharma. For the so-called mood disorders (“depression” and “bipolar”) and “schizophrenia/psychotic disorder,” 100% of the panel members had financial involvements with drug companies. Sales of the drugs prescribed for these (by virtue of their inclusion in the DSM) reach more than $80 billion worldwide.
Apparently the APA psychiatrists did not want to give up this cashcow. For the DSM-V revision, another study found that 18 of the 20 members overseeing the revision of clinical guidelines for treating just three “mental disorders” had financial ties to drug companies, with drug treatment for these disorders generate some $25 billion a year in pharmaceutical sales (U.S. alone).
Under such public criticism and a year after it had been under investigation by the Senate Finance Committee for its conflicts of interest in drug companies, in March 2009, the APA announced that it would phase out pharmaceutical funding of continuing medical education seminars and meals at its conventions. However, within two months, the APA accepted more than $1.7 million in pharmaceutical company funds for its annual conference, held in San Francisco.
Not surprising. In 2002, the APA’s Anand Pandya said that without pharmaceutical industry funds, membership dues could escalate 455% from $540 a year to $3,000. Pandya is president of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), which in 2009 as also asked to provide records of its pharmaceutical company funding to federal investigators.
Psychiatry’s 300% increase of mental disorders in the DSM over five decades has already generated billions of dollars in government funding. Since DSM-IV, there has been also been a 256% increase in psychiatric (antipsychotics and antidepressants) drug sales.
Just how far psychiatrists will go using the DSM to label people “disordered” is reflected in a recent survey conducted by Ronald Kessler, professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School. He relied upon the DSM to survey Americans and concluded that nearly every second one (48%) suffers from at least one mental illness during their lifetime.[3] A “DSM–IV personality disorders” survey that he conducted for the World Health Organization, the results of which were published in 2009, was heavily funded by Eli Lilly Foundation, Ortho-McNeil, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer. Kessler himself is a consultant for at least seven drug companies.
More to the point, as the late Dr. Sydney Walker III, a neurologist and psychiatrist, wrote: “Drug company money influences every aspect of modern-day psychiatry. The American Psychiatric Association is literally built on a foundation of drug money…In return, the APA bends over backward to help drug companies promote their products.”[4] “That influence,” he said, “has focused on expanding the number of ‘psychiatric disorders’ recognized by the APA, and the number of drug treatments recommended for these disorders. After all, every DSM ‘diagnosis,’ is a potential gold mine for pharmaceutical firms.”[5]
No Scientific Validity
As the diagnoses completely lack scientific criteria, anyone can be labeled mentally ill, and subjected to dangerous and life-threatening treatments based solely on opinion. The scientific validity of the DSM has come under increasing attack from medical professionals and scientific experts such as Herb Kutchins of California State University and Stuart A. Kirk of UCLA, and authors of Making Us Crazy: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders, determined that “…there is ample reason to conclude that the latest versions of DSM as a clinical tool are unreliable and therefore of questionable validity as a classification system.”
The late Loren Mosher, M.D., a Clinical Professor of Psychiatry who resigned from the APA because of its drug company influence, wrote: “DSM-IV has become a bible and a money making bestseller—its major failings notwithstanding. It confines and defines practice, some take it seriously, others more realistically.”
Further, “The issue is what do the categories [in DSM] tell us? Do they in fact accurately represent the person with a problem? They don’t, and can’t, because there are no external validating criteria for psychiatric diagnoses. There is neither a blood test nor specific anatomic lesions for any major psychiatric disorder.”
The internationally renowned professor of psychiatry emeritus Thomas Szasz, supports this point, writing: “There is no blood or other biological test to ascertain the presence of a mental illness, as there is for most bodily diseases. If such a test were developed, then the condition would cease to be a mental illness and would be classified, instead, as a symptom of a bodily disease.” So classified, it would make psychiatry redundant, and general physicians would replace it.
Therein lies the underlying problem of DSM—it isn’t a medical diagnostic system. Its all based on opinion—and faulty at best. Psychiatry lacked a system equivalent to that in medicine, and this contributed greatly to its poor reputation, both among medical professionals and the population as a whole. Thus it invented DSM to both convince real medicine of psychiatry’s legitimacy and to capture a slice of the insurance market. As Kutchins and Kirk point out, the evolution of the DSM is a “story of the struggles of the American Psychiatric Association to gain respectability within medicine and maintain dominance among the many mental health professionals.”[6]
Further, they assumed that if “a group of psychiatrists agree on a list of atypical [new] behaviors, the behaviors constitute a valid mental disorder. Using this approach, creating mental disorders can become a parlor game in which clusters of all kinds of behaviors (i.e. syndromes) can be added to the manual.” In fact, all DSM succeeds in doing is “to medicalize too many human troubles.”
Even psychiatrist Al Parides observes: “what they have done is medicalize many problems that don’t have demonstrable, biological causes.
Other Expert Quotes Show No Science to DSM
Jeffrey A. Schaler, Ph.D.: says its tantamount to fraud. “The notion of scientific validity…is related to fraud. Validity refers to the extent to which something represents or measures what it purports to represent or measure. When diagnostic measures do not represent what they purport to represent, we say that the measures lack validity. If a business transaction or trade rested on such a lack of validity, we might say that the lack of validity was instrumental in a commitment of fraud.”
Psychiatry has been unable to determine a single cause for a single mental disorder.
Dr. Harold Pincus, Vice Chairman of the DSM-IV task force admitted, “There has never been any criterion that psychiatric diagnoses require a demonstrated biological etiology (cause).”
Psychologist Renee Garfinkel, a staff member of the American Psychological Association, said of the DSM-III-R review committee: “The low level of intellectual effort was shocking. Diagnoses were developed by majority vote on the level we would use to choose a restaurant. You feel like Italian, I feel like Chinese, so let’s go to a cafeteria. Then it’s typed into the computer.”
J. Allan Hobson and Jonathan A. Leonard, authors of Out of Its Mind, Psychiatry in Crisis, A Call For Reform: “…DSM-IV’s authoritative status and detailed nature tends to promote the idea that rote diagnosis and pill-pushing are acceptable.”
Elliot S. Valenstein, biopsychologist, author of Blaming the Brain: “DSM-IV is not an exciting document. It is purely descriptive and presents no new scientific insights or any theories about what causes the many mental disorders it lists.”
The DSM-V review psychiatrists should take heed of Paul Genova, M.D., writing in Psychiatric Times, who said, the “DSM diagnostic system has outlived its usefulness by about two decades. It should be abandoned, not revised.”
[1] Shankar Vedantam, “Drug Ads Hyping Anxiety Make Some Uneasy,” The Washington Post, 16 July 2001.
[2] Kelly O’Meara, addressing CCHR 34th Anniversary and Human Rights Awards, Los Angeles, 2002.
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Comorbidity_Survey; http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/ncs/; http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/content/41/9/22.full?maxtoshow=&HITS=&hits=&RESULTFORMAT=1&andorexacttitle=and&titleabstract=ADHD+%2522social+status%2522+reward+dopamine&andorexacttitleabs=or&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=120&sortspec=relevan.
[4] Sydney Walker, III, M.D., A Dose of Sanity, ( John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1996), p. 229.
[5] Sydney Walker, III, M.D., A Dose of Sanity, ( John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1996), p. 230.
[6] Op. cit., Herb Kutchins, Stuart A. Kirk, Making Us Crazy, p. 22.
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
POSSIBLE GANG STALKING ACTIVITY IN TORONTO
Sunday (JUNE 4)I went to the park and spent a few hours. As I came back to the parking lot I noticed a car parked next to mine in an all but empty parking lot with no hub caps. (I noticed it because there were no hub caps.) Anyway, as I walked to my car a white middle aged male who was sitting in the drivers seat of a silver four van parked a few lanes away from my car in an isolated spot, just waiting, looked out in my direction. As he did so he got out of a silver van, opened all his doors and started cleaning his windows.
WEIRD I THOUGHT, IT WAS SUCH A HOT AFTERNOON TO BE DOING SO IN A PARKING LOT OF A PUBLIC PARK. I READ THAT THIS IS THE SORT TO THINK COMMMUNITY POLICEMEN DO WHEN KEEPING THE COMMUNITY SAFE. IE COMMUNITY SPIES.
PS AS I TYPING THIS THE TOP OF MY LEFT EYE SUDDENLY STARTS HURTING AS IT FEELS LIKE SOME ENERGY IMPACTED THE AREA. HMMMMMMMMMMMMM.
SEE http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Structure.html
WEIRD I THOUGHT, IT WAS SUCH A HOT AFTERNOON TO BE DOING SO IN A PARKING LOT OF A PUBLIC PARK. I READ THAT THIS IS THE SORT TO THINK COMMMUNITY POLICEMEN DO WHEN KEEPING THE COMMUNITY SAFE. IE COMMUNITY SPIES.
PS AS I TYPING THIS THE TOP OF MY LEFT EYE SUDDENLY STARTS HURTING AS IT FEELS LIKE SOME ENERGY IMPACTED THE AREA. HMMMMMMMMMMMMM.
SEE http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Structure.html
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
COVERT MICROWAVE ATTACKS???
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/lawson.htm
I START LISTENING TO A UTUBE CHANNEL AND SUDDENLY MY EAR STARTS HURTING, AND KNEES STARTS BURNING AND PULSING. A SPOT ON THE TOP OF THE LEFT SIDE OF HEAD IS PULSING IN PAIN AND MY CHINESE NEIGHBOUR DIRECTLY ABOVE ME IS MAKING SCRAPING NOISES SUDDENLY.
SEE http://www.freedomfchs.com/auditoryresponsetopulsedrf.pdf
http://www.freedomfchs.com/historyofelectromagneticweapons.pdf
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/lawson.htm
I START LISTENING TO A UTUBE CHANNEL AND SUDDENLY MY EAR STARTS HURTING, AND KNEES STARTS BURNING AND PULSING. A SPOT ON THE TOP OF THE LEFT SIDE OF HEAD IS PULSING IN PAIN AND MY CHINESE NEIGHBOUR DIRECTLY ABOVE ME IS MAKING SCRAPING NOISES SUDDENLY.
SEE http://www.freedomfchs.com/auditoryresponsetopulsedrf.pdf
http://www.freedomfchs.com/historyofelectromagneticweapons.pdf
RED RUBBER BAND IN CAR...HMMMM
I USED A RUBBER BAND TO ATTACH MY IPOD INSIDE MY CAR. YESTERDAY THE RED BAND I WAS USING BROKE.
TODAY I WENT TO MY YOGA CLASS AT THE VEDIC TEMPLE IN SCARBOROUGH. THIS CLASS IS ATTENDED BY MAINLY EAST INDIANS. I FINISHED MY CLASS AND WALKED TO MY CAR, OPENED IT AND THERE ON THE DASHBOARD WAS AN UNBROKEN RED RUBBER BAND.
SURPRISE SURPRISE!!!!!!
ALSO AS I WAS LEAVING MY BUILDING AT BAMBURGH CIRCLE TORONTO, A CHINESE MAN AND HIS SON WAS ON THE ELEVATOR. I STEPPED IN AND HE AND HIS SON WALKED BEHIND ME TO HIS VAN PARKED A FEW SPACES AWAY FROM MINE IN THE UNDERGROUND PARKING. WHEN I RETURNED ABOUT 3 HOURS LATER, THE SAME MAN AND HIS SON WHO IS ABOUT 8 YEARS OLD CAME AROUND THE CORNER TO THE ELEVATOR AS I WALKED TOWARDS THE ELEVATOR MYSELF.
THIS IN ITSELF IS NOT UNUSUAL, I SEE THIS MAN QUITE OFTEN, AT IRREGULAR TIMES. WHAT IS UNUSUAL IS THE PATTERN THAT I HAVE OBSERVED WITH THE RESIDENTS IN THE BUILDING. THE PAKISTANI NEIGHBOURS HAVE THE SAME SCHEDULE AS MYSELF EVEN WHEN THE TIMES I EXIT AND ENTER VARIES HUGELY. THE PEOPLE PARKED AROUND ME ALSO HAS THE SAME SCHEDULES AS MYSELF EVEN WHEN I VARY MY TIMES OF EXIT AND ENTRY.
TODAY I WENT TO MY YOGA CLASS AT THE VEDIC TEMPLE IN SCARBOROUGH. THIS CLASS IS ATTENDED BY MAINLY EAST INDIANS. I FINISHED MY CLASS AND WALKED TO MY CAR, OPENED IT AND THERE ON THE DASHBOARD WAS AN UNBROKEN RED RUBBER BAND.
SURPRISE SURPRISE!!!!!!
ALSO AS I WAS LEAVING MY BUILDING AT BAMBURGH CIRCLE TORONTO, A CHINESE MAN AND HIS SON WAS ON THE ELEVATOR. I STEPPED IN AND HE AND HIS SON WALKED BEHIND ME TO HIS VAN PARKED A FEW SPACES AWAY FROM MINE IN THE UNDERGROUND PARKING. WHEN I RETURNED ABOUT 3 HOURS LATER, THE SAME MAN AND HIS SON WHO IS ABOUT 8 YEARS OLD CAME AROUND THE CORNER TO THE ELEVATOR AS I WALKED TOWARDS THE ELEVATOR MYSELF.
THIS IN ITSELF IS NOT UNUSUAL, I SEE THIS MAN QUITE OFTEN, AT IRREGULAR TIMES. WHAT IS UNUSUAL IS THE PATTERN THAT I HAVE OBSERVED WITH THE RESIDENTS IN THE BUILDING. THE PAKISTANI NEIGHBOURS HAVE THE SAME SCHEDULE AS MYSELF EVEN WHEN THE TIMES I EXIT AND ENTER VARIES HUGELY. THE PEOPLE PARKED AROUND ME ALSO HAS THE SAME SCHEDULES AS MYSELF EVEN WHEN I VARY MY TIMES OF EXIT AND ENTRY.
Monday, June 21, 2010
TARGETTING THE HUMAN BODY WITH DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
http://www.freedomfchs.com/targetingwdews.pdf
AS I BLOG THIS A SPOT ON THE INSIDE OF THE LEFT PALM IS SUDDENLY STARTING TO HURT IN A PULSING FASHION.
I LIVE IN THE SAME ARE AS HELEN KURDIN FROM THE UTUBE CHANNEL:
'HELENKURDIN"
PLEASE VISIT AND EDUCATE YOURSELF NEW TECHNOLOGIES THAT PUT WOMEN AT RISK.
AS I BLOG THIS A SPOT ON THE INSIDE OF THE LEFT PALM IS SUDDENLY STARTING TO HURT IN A PULSING FASHION.
I LIVE IN THE SAME ARE AS HELEN KURDIN FROM THE UTUBE CHANNEL:
'HELENKURDIN"
PLEASE VISIT AND EDUCATE YOURSELF NEW TECHNOLOGIES THAT PUT WOMEN AT RISK.
PAKISTANI NEIGHBOUR -FATHER AND SON TIMES ME OUT OF MY UNIT...
Yesterday as I stepped out of my unit AT ABOUT 2PM, the pakistani neighours, father and son stepped out of their unit next to mine 10 seconds after I stepped into the corridor. The son looked at me with a huge smile on his face, the father looked at me and said nothing - HE WALKED ABOUT TEN STEPS TOWARDS THE ELEVATOR, THEN HE (THE FATHER) TURNED BACK, WALKED TOWARDS ME AND ENTERED TOHIS UNIT ONE MORE TIME. AFTER ABOUT 5 SECONDS HE WALKED BACK OUT AND WALKED TO THE ELEVATOR. I WAITED FOR THEM TO LEAVE AND THEM PROCEEDED TO THE ELEVATOR
ABOUT 4 HOURS LATER (I WENT TO THE PARK) I RETURNED. AS I WAS ABOUT TO STEP INTO MY UNIT, THE SAME SON REFERRED TO ABOVE STEPPED OUT OF THE DOOR AT THE END OF THE CORRIDOR AND WALKED TOWARDS ME TO HIS UNIT. THE TIMING WAS SO PERFECT IT WAS ASTONISHING.
THIS PATTERN OF BEHAVIOUR WAS EXHIBITED BY THE OTHER PAKISTANI NEIGHBOUR SON FOR A LONG TIME. (LIVING ACROSS THE CORRIDOR FROM MY UNIT) HE EVEN FOLLOWED ME BACK AND FORTH FROM THE ELEVATOR A FEW TIMES. WHEN ASKED WHY HE WAS DOING THIS HE SAID WE HAD THE SAME SCHEDULE EVEN THOUGH I VARIED MY TIME SIGNIFICANTLY.
ABOUT 4 HOURS LATER (I WENT TO THE PARK) I RETURNED. AS I WAS ABOUT TO STEP INTO MY UNIT, THE SAME SON REFERRED TO ABOVE STEPPED OUT OF THE DOOR AT THE END OF THE CORRIDOR AND WALKED TOWARDS ME TO HIS UNIT. THE TIMING WAS SO PERFECT IT WAS ASTONISHING.
THIS PATTERN OF BEHAVIOUR WAS EXHIBITED BY THE OTHER PAKISTANI NEIGHBOUR SON FOR A LONG TIME. (LIVING ACROSS THE CORRIDOR FROM MY UNIT) HE EVEN FOLLOWED ME BACK AND FORTH FROM THE ELEVATOR A FEW TIMES. WHEN ASKED WHY HE WAS DOING THIS HE SAID WE HAD THE SAME SCHEDULE EVEN THOUGH I VARIED MY TIME SIGNIFICANTLY.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
REAL ESTATE AGENT AND MOTHER GANG STALKED - SEE FREEDOMFCHS.COM VIDEO LINK
Yesterday evening, (JUNE 16) I was talking on the phone in my normal voice and a chinese woman passed by outside my door talking in chinese, but immediately outside my door she said 'BE QUIET' A COUPLE OF TIMES VERY LOUDLY. THEN SHE PROCEEDED TO TALK IN CHINESE - I AM NOT SURE WHETHER SHE WAS ALONE OR NOT, SINCE I HEARD ONLY ONE VOICE.
It has been very common in the past that each time I start talking on the phone in my home, there is increased traffic outside my door with accompanying miscellaneous noises. AS SOON AS I STOP TALKING THE NOISES AND TRAFFIC STOPS. THE NEIGHBOUR'S DOOR OPPOSITE ME CONSTANTLY OPENS AND CLOSES AND THE EXIT DOOR IN THE CORRIDOR BANGS SHUT SEVERAL TIMES.
THERE IS ALSO A LOT OF NOISES FROM THE UNIT DIRECTLY ABOVE ME.
BAMBURGH CIRCLE, TORONTO.
Monday, June 7, 2010
WEIRD MESSAGE ON MY UTUBE ACCOUNT WHEN I WENT INTO "VIDEO" LINK UNDER MY ACCOUNT
500 Internal Server Error
Sorry, something went wrong.
A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation.
If you see them, show them this information:
F8BEXE-60KKYr5HldOkqWdHOrJa94nOtfjQ9HPA-0aCe01-L5QQPhNEIeP8w
iXlOOqXjFMX4Ktyv2ry4YM_XqRXjM9tczyhfWL9v8t5GZGeHs4Gfhxw0COan
mhHRLpvoqV2QSf5ti6hB2NEtWEeX2zbEbp_8_r2klLcarCPABlwF1RDP4L4f
A5I2sTrIfz9m4E9UInHZ6Ghil-cLRWfSrmZCw4BK5mKvBGXe75foYl3xaV1p
4f8HEq8j8aJa0W-iPGSNAIeWqDhfyy2Xn9hT7Vy4HBCROg9HFOT_4TfnVO3a
D05XHzr0HQ_dLTmqj8dYsHzl5iUwkuSPY-1av49wNB2zipATu4JGri5jpR7E
xBnUiMh9qNnd-Cze1TtMt-xRwjZ2tREqaBrhNizC4C5L6eoHYQtw9cwCNcu9
hDe3vM2sJO0abGQY4tm6Nn7Jbhfrk6CzGB8shyMWE8Hak77Nbgd0pjuYHhXQ
nidVwb1PzV69WEYcRwRQqQwTS2DW8hmXvqwYE41Z6uAmvdOxGyf4CVF6PZPq
MrHsXvatVrhh8UdPcNbxwZEYkCl1tVryZVuIkE3PEWSIehInCDnx_zNTLcST
bs37mBgJOeklnCwVs_DPqq5cfc8l-VNFaoACd8_3OyDAqtMF9T1GjEnW4wnA
iuDrDwbvjtLY9UprBUXE3cx_lOFp1tVxsKfEOCKRV1sciDogFESKj3-lTvO4
ojfSazjJVYOGtfm1hc1oolZdlxBFiKGBScmtIru2X8P1AnVGpDoyax4dtMjk
arv9pq8P1dlqOvMyzxyT7K1HT6AxUk3T9DpDrbm5voq-1BhCZbghzC9LYtKo
gFmya3C_krYvW3uzhImlZN9gT0m7dBSbdJBuisKgHpBWGUiBMH1Jm8vXZ-ei
zuWe3jIN-tIeeGWS_Edq4KEz6ppb95udJ3ZwcxhlpbqwAjxGxwA9K9y0x8Dd
jC_nChsSzf8y9gxzcGlKf25FhhLuqZXHTRPeunUxvOAYyqKPi6XfIchesrKi
27T4yh17hm7uCr9OwJGvkr76FPNWg1TRBcuRICmjNxNI7wZtzYklxoF8zFxw
7u4VUQXYIloZRxY9XKH17GYCnWIzmDPVbX4Mccp9LGh_coJFzqauV7dIDr_F
694irs3CTTKo8CYVOC6XZsdzxYiedR9pl14SBRuzetDLXEKiM9XlgDlvwIrC
TDri5ZkmfOhwuAiMjOUFK3oEW8ZMLxsKOjlsFZPA6uiVPRaelq0p45pP-i4N
oA82xdL9Uw0q5DaMrHMBGr4YdFemD6DscBGBALz7n1v5ybLU2nIuDrQ2b8xW
2JR2dKteEevi1_xTk1zzkiVeF7ec5J0jN1egKnkJsr7wpGNTWmgSwhx1nRj6
ZVdZaUE-x5AB7RnscAFKmDQbNzmvlCF8nNdHSAwu776fE-3_juC-GL94o2TG
VrkAmwjBFhJ68cSctB47h-10SlHfkcFH7FricSrbD1qQIZLN_dr4rAGwnUy1
5EsAEDBqV6rijz14uXobc1Xro1aO7dm4ssaSsxeVhxRiE56BpxiG5Uorsc_j
fT-yzdTci-Qy5lBnhv3bKjGt5CLUav_otinOsv0SqxUpoZTI6bLVxBj75oEi
p3kGBcS2-ezzGDLJ1OUJ4b7ynrQxdjNSq8VeZn-VLeaQBKQWS_OaDh9KaZk-
CcSwpx1XAMOU3VtdM0ItfE6KVb5pqyM620fquz8GFKpmB-4eC7WjIKwTk0qz
5UrwB4FJ5ijY_owv9UFVcCf5achQPNcLgJ2o5VkNq8HugS6qtefOlvNkwa2l
y9f44A-5MQeGfz8sfP7t0D7FHY18YZuoP5NO3nuIYcplQP7bOo8dxw4PDVPc
zvWx6PPx0il4qqo2duwV1a6LysV-cgyvOJXnVn9F1-kBmFCF5y4WJ4_d-6zR
QFbhdRxv8opLiMByCNTj7uNFik0WQASLckgVAHLITmZjybBpYfyEXsCpawte
goC3vWRlbqvLs-HbQDKkJ4TnM9Hpr69jrRCfHX82ZiC6sRgTvQ3ASuWze-vS
rQVN9BZSG8H5TU9A_NJUyeDHoT4YinSJdlCvp8nKjPWxRQe6m-oyd6Yhp5L1
8w7TxEbYuh8w1BBkeHNIcZVJS32UmSSp4FzvxRpl-X4FSvy5nZZyFwf8GwZG
fFh6NNMSGYdQmWi1oh4P7pA98UzihpNQzR6mOQAQdsztYw3G_0e5D-mq0sr5
zkeeL9458bSLhBFhp6UgdvwUWyAr_RHRNsJ8hDkc4JFy2Vsm-XHZjpsqDAja
iHn-2NNReXhZW9SyzPWOtvRCJnwroKrxsyMub3Ku-acIKvaB1dzGZtXRi-q2
ctNr1TSdgdpCMUB9OE1cJidoTWcxMKXY75Cqbj8uocntW36U60VrUrWDi6t_
qu-59kRdOrR31-EwnyUpPv3Tc3yIO52DTZYoea_e_ALO_F78l1HLrqfAUWPe
I-d4R1nrpnCLoM35NS1KHqQJoC2Hyix2zfvda9eI-HAPoG7YsjpQFy6zwA0q
rrHUOoZuWziCP4KI1n47xZqYb68hPfk5uV3w9zt6LFB_D-tCpWqHsU__nxmz
2xsbACJ2DbadvBwnkrJ1UVchtqL4XWGri_UTACbFaPf8sD8L7oiFVWEL0kme
uP39HfkDcvZg38SvYPX3qLB1KmFjfICluBYqMBLcsceMjFzg4v0LYd3174hC
x1EjYx82a9PIHm79TTl8Ncl7F3tknNd8Cop8XV99nUS8Xp7RcUZa4QDek7bb
70yvET23z3U6DNFpKWIMK6uC3pG8az8I8Ja5PpJeWNPKkt8UeWeec4VS2RkZ
uNwzDN2IQKQsI5yozmB3xmEV1sw7rUF7daB8PTkISMVCjiv6C5as-KxGkl8W
HbyFvFotzl5E4qT-7sHuJwxHgUSyshe4Q2Cm9xQyluiI9j3AlT2hdQ6tUh_n
DA-rN91F5HB_ftbAjPJ873smLZul6XMCTkc-gxjK0ZrD4IO4WxXTeMv-iPk8
jaxucW1tsJnp3hNDWOws1XC7aET0V5WLMhic6rsRkmqZryIWxISXt-KZXFc3
MKvsw0c50z4A-uLhY9JWZhmC_6rrlal0bWeNev1HRrm44qqdC---i5dqIUM2
5bxT0f4c7ni24r8eUdjLVmu0DJYAGbotKGFP92YjphY0LQoN1YD8MJg3mqaD
HXuOdnYCVyHWPwK_-7ZOk-Y6lKJy2DSLcGWdcUVv6JXkBcgMw8RxKcXWGctM
RQLeNiXuR_jQT9OY_HtxLZUmjOlNAf9cigh-Re46LSTZXXdrY_0Lp3YefYYD
L1ERgLup7_aUNs4xAM0_ufPBaeZQrPI2X7VHPgUpFkdeZU4kYpfkbCcBxhE1
G1gqxr2GvBq2-RVt6XNg0G567w8bH7NJvcnJphiBrVcMLq50wdWrZT-N2PJs
zWyetTp8qaMdaAUmT_dEQ6vFKAMr_H827CMB0BwH5PSB_MevKXfkNxhzF782
xB8MhV0pbgkCJzuO9B3rV3k0oqTzppkX4y_ELda8XhK9e4VKtIX1UFLgyUbl
sj-zCzETWrqvJKici6AAGCTyH7z2BKQuo97Jmud_EHX7aWwxlbUZ0GdxNULK
jdjzsUNW_Vu4ZiKYdQEbShy4QqYMwOtkzFzQUdXhppFKktngnOEc0UupSIUH
FL_cC_UsuQcDeJFJ3F-lgphkSVhoSz_5nzhv-1AWUOrkzMlmUY3JHKrDsx4V
qJtLby1f74qUVvBZg47O0EuCcGNFdrwefuo-T3t5GjiJaJZiymEhdlHfUk5H
32w4KIRTbm02HQPsyStAZSI5mRhgXF2czr9xpSxb2_ZVpsS4Ny3YPa9-oqDI
7vka_ynIMTSMpZdt1R5dRIuJBoCGw7Y0JRYCS98ldpIoTpOsAa-DUVIJ2oAG
PPCiA9m4YMLPObfd8cTiGKpCVzjk2ipIRgqZoBEqEysPuHVVxp7XFRAYJFrr
hLYsAIgrMJ6melSJBtmRZoCjBs9eiIuBLF6lt1Y77rbtRd_VRCy6aTXhz_AD
VvHfM7tkLITnmVH4xXKuEIBCyahOa9q085a2TV0tQT4AmYlhKVrKzGbNg86u
LdNhCrseGexosr1PtWq_xpZvb-vWFn4UrFfTXODs05FbNKSN7poYZ-SJm0_r
oQVnK4HLOJyJO6cK8o7rDR2qz1BPTP1z9L2rkuCMhphFJ7f6KN6sYE270e_E
EwT4gB64CqVZf0Nvsq4gwOs9zCoHdc2dluU5xkSGapFepnggFBC9xci8yuJe
SsV0nmMX84W4qRT9Qu7x9UbE15Wt-btKDn-t9aGRJcNmu9diDomOZ3YM9u6s
hEDT3ppZZAtZFjNe6vxv36kUf26xTzasforOaaOpEuZOtXJK3ayE0Z5qwaax
CwFFliB-pG7pQmoIZgpspZGFF7W2bbN3_u-X_VGXgBkzpMBX6Iry4-DjdrKc
LqOLUApWYAsEy6DP1oqUIQsQzLJoyEhCRQSf6uosUfFFYAg94I8tkHgOjaVT
K3IRr0J_DF4zUMjHarf4awz222iGCOIDPgkBUrM8F_mcyvofFwOlVJUAWvNf
vv1IPqkSkkJaReOF4cTHf0nDEYTXfDLWGcg2KN3lTbGGvpoK_dVIO4MMrVkk
1ZUIPfawS9ny26qaEwoy25o6hwRLtZiavpi5dJolve_BT6kAbuPGsCCbCeX2
vSXjvlw4JW88MEcna2Wo7SIy8LXYT3nSXAKP-CYAEKih9dGMQ14zr9ukuaXX
i8lBCZXbFHpvAgyrKQeeeRtkLYpE-h9g-gARgsUokQL1XrDBLLhyaz1gaVJM
MIP2fhnyywJSXgGUW9QTklObZDbMiYDVAY8uMyzk0hscHwt6uYnwM_HrrAt2
V-fG0TGd6-PHghpqfj1sQ6RebPnGXSmRoXku91bcLHQf7MMKB-CPVjP1WZ1E
Hy7H93dTys7eLQ7g8CxuTOxby9mtAliU6Vn0IRjkvUt8YK9PuVAwW_TW5nrO
RzoHJBl3lnbX3wv7LOEG7dLOSnog4MJzbHzwQf8e6iVVQFJwDfy6ET6CIHbV
74zUeY3j7aua6bbK-tBWLUZNRx0=
Sorry, something went wrong.
A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation.
If you see them, show them this information:
F8BEXE-60KKYr5HldOkqWdHOrJa94nOtfjQ9HPA-0aCe01-L5QQPhNEIeP8w
iXlOOqXjFMX4Ktyv2ry4YM_XqRXjM9tczyhfWL9v8t5GZGeHs4Gfhxw0COan
mhHRLpvoqV2QSf5ti6hB2NEtWEeX2zbEbp_8_r2klLcarCPABlwF1RDP4L4f
A5I2sTrIfz9m4E9UInHZ6Ghil-cLRWfSrmZCw4BK5mKvBGXe75foYl3xaV1p
4f8HEq8j8aJa0W-iPGSNAIeWqDhfyy2Xn9hT7Vy4HBCROg9HFOT_4TfnVO3a
D05XHzr0HQ_dLTmqj8dYsHzl5iUwkuSPY-1av49wNB2zipATu4JGri5jpR7E
xBnUiMh9qNnd-Cze1TtMt-xRwjZ2tREqaBrhNizC4C5L6eoHYQtw9cwCNcu9
hDe3vM2sJO0abGQY4tm6Nn7Jbhfrk6CzGB8shyMWE8Hak77Nbgd0pjuYHhXQ
nidVwb1PzV69WEYcRwRQqQwTS2DW8hmXvqwYE41Z6uAmvdOxGyf4CVF6PZPq
MrHsXvatVrhh8UdPcNbxwZEYkCl1tVryZVuIkE3PEWSIehInCDnx_zNTLcST
bs37mBgJOeklnCwVs_DPqq5cfc8l-VNFaoACd8_3OyDAqtMF9T1GjEnW4wnA
iuDrDwbvjtLY9UprBUXE3cx_lOFp1tVxsKfEOCKRV1sciDogFESKj3-lTvO4
ojfSazjJVYOGtfm1hc1oolZdlxBFiKGBScmtIru2X8P1AnVGpDoyax4dtMjk
arv9pq8P1dlqOvMyzxyT7K1HT6AxUk3T9DpDrbm5voq-1BhCZbghzC9LYtKo
gFmya3C_krYvW3uzhImlZN9gT0m7dBSbdJBuisKgHpBWGUiBMH1Jm8vXZ-ei
zuWe3jIN-tIeeGWS_Edq4KEz6ppb95udJ3ZwcxhlpbqwAjxGxwA9K9y0x8Dd
jC_nChsSzf8y9gxzcGlKf25FhhLuqZXHTRPeunUxvOAYyqKPi6XfIchesrKi
27T4yh17hm7uCr9OwJGvkr76FPNWg1TRBcuRICmjNxNI7wZtzYklxoF8zFxw
7u4VUQXYIloZRxY9XKH17GYCnWIzmDPVbX4Mccp9LGh_coJFzqauV7dIDr_F
694irs3CTTKo8CYVOC6XZsdzxYiedR9pl14SBRuzetDLXEKiM9XlgDlvwIrC
TDri5ZkmfOhwuAiMjOUFK3oEW8ZMLxsKOjlsFZPA6uiVPRaelq0p45pP-i4N
oA82xdL9Uw0q5DaMrHMBGr4YdFemD6DscBGBALz7n1v5ybLU2nIuDrQ2b8xW
2JR2dKteEevi1_xTk1zzkiVeF7ec5J0jN1egKnkJsr7wpGNTWmgSwhx1nRj6
ZVdZaUE-x5AB7RnscAFKmDQbNzmvlCF8nNdHSAwu776fE-3_juC-GL94o2TG
VrkAmwjBFhJ68cSctB47h-10SlHfkcFH7FricSrbD1qQIZLN_dr4rAGwnUy1
5EsAEDBqV6rijz14uXobc1Xro1aO7dm4ssaSsxeVhxRiE56BpxiG5Uorsc_j
fT-yzdTci-Qy5lBnhv3bKjGt5CLUav_otinOsv0SqxUpoZTI6bLVxBj75oEi
p3kGBcS2-ezzGDLJ1OUJ4b7ynrQxdjNSq8VeZn-VLeaQBKQWS_OaDh9KaZk-
CcSwpx1XAMOU3VtdM0ItfE6KVb5pqyM620fquz8GFKpmB-4eC7WjIKwTk0qz
5UrwB4FJ5ijY_owv9UFVcCf5achQPNcLgJ2o5VkNq8HugS6qtefOlvNkwa2l
y9f44A-5MQeGfz8sfP7t0D7FHY18YZuoP5NO3nuIYcplQP7bOo8dxw4PDVPc
zvWx6PPx0il4qqo2duwV1a6LysV-cgyvOJXnVn9F1-kBmFCF5y4WJ4_d-6zR
QFbhdRxv8opLiMByCNTj7uNFik0WQASLckgVAHLITmZjybBpYfyEXsCpawte
goC3vWRlbqvLs-HbQDKkJ4TnM9Hpr69jrRCfHX82ZiC6sRgTvQ3ASuWze-vS
rQVN9BZSG8H5TU9A_NJUyeDHoT4YinSJdlCvp8nKjPWxRQe6m-oyd6Yhp5L1
8w7TxEbYuh8w1BBkeHNIcZVJS32UmSSp4FzvxRpl-X4FSvy5nZZyFwf8GwZG
fFh6NNMSGYdQmWi1oh4P7pA98UzihpNQzR6mOQAQdsztYw3G_0e5D-mq0sr5
zkeeL9458bSLhBFhp6UgdvwUWyAr_RHRNsJ8hDkc4JFy2Vsm-XHZjpsqDAja
iHn-2NNReXhZW9SyzPWOtvRCJnwroKrxsyMub3Ku-acIKvaB1dzGZtXRi-q2
ctNr1TSdgdpCMUB9OE1cJidoTWcxMKXY75Cqbj8uocntW36U60VrUrWDi6t_
qu-59kRdOrR31-EwnyUpPv3Tc3yIO52DTZYoea_e_ALO_F78l1HLrqfAUWPe
I-d4R1nrpnCLoM35NS1KHqQJoC2Hyix2zfvda9eI-HAPoG7YsjpQFy6zwA0q
rrHUOoZuWziCP4KI1n47xZqYb68hPfk5uV3w9zt6LFB_D-tCpWqHsU__nxmz
2xsbACJ2DbadvBwnkrJ1UVchtqL4XWGri_UTACbFaPf8sD8L7oiFVWEL0kme
uP39HfkDcvZg38SvYPX3qLB1KmFjfICluBYqMBLcsceMjFzg4v0LYd3174hC
x1EjYx82a9PIHm79TTl8Ncl7F3tknNd8Cop8XV99nUS8Xp7RcUZa4QDek7bb
70yvET23z3U6DNFpKWIMK6uC3pG8az8I8Ja5PpJeWNPKkt8UeWeec4VS2RkZ
uNwzDN2IQKQsI5yozmB3xmEV1sw7rUF7daB8PTkISMVCjiv6C5as-KxGkl8W
HbyFvFotzl5E4qT-7sHuJwxHgUSyshe4Q2Cm9xQyluiI9j3AlT2hdQ6tUh_n
DA-rN91F5HB_ftbAjPJ873smLZul6XMCTkc-gxjK0ZrD4IO4WxXTeMv-iPk8
jaxucW1tsJnp3hNDWOws1XC7aET0V5WLMhic6rsRkmqZryIWxISXt-KZXFc3
MKvsw0c50z4A-uLhY9JWZhmC_6rrlal0bWeNev1HRrm44qqdC---i5dqIUM2
5bxT0f4c7ni24r8eUdjLVmu0DJYAGbotKGFP92YjphY0LQoN1YD8MJg3mqaD
HXuOdnYCVyHWPwK_-7ZOk-Y6lKJy2DSLcGWdcUVv6JXkBcgMw8RxKcXWGctM
RQLeNiXuR_jQT9OY_HtxLZUmjOlNAf9cigh-Re46LSTZXXdrY_0Lp3YefYYD
L1ERgLup7_aUNs4xAM0_ufPBaeZQrPI2X7VHPgUpFkdeZU4kYpfkbCcBxhE1
G1gqxr2GvBq2-RVt6XNg0G567w8bH7NJvcnJphiBrVcMLq50wdWrZT-N2PJs
zWyetTp8qaMdaAUmT_dEQ6vFKAMr_H827CMB0BwH5PSB_MevKXfkNxhzF782
xB8MhV0pbgkCJzuO9B3rV3k0oqTzppkX4y_ELda8XhK9e4VKtIX1UFLgyUbl
sj-zCzETWrqvJKici6AAGCTyH7z2BKQuo97Jmud_EHX7aWwxlbUZ0GdxNULK
jdjzsUNW_Vu4ZiKYdQEbShy4QqYMwOtkzFzQUdXhppFKktngnOEc0UupSIUH
FL_cC_UsuQcDeJFJ3F-lgphkSVhoSz_5nzhv-1AWUOrkzMlmUY3JHKrDsx4V
qJtLby1f74qUVvBZg47O0EuCcGNFdrwefuo-T3t5GjiJaJZiymEhdlHfUk5H
32w4KIRTbm02HQPsyStAZSI5mRhgXF2czr9xpSxb2_ZVpsS4Ny3YPa9-oqDI
7vka_ynIMTSMpZdt1R5dRIuJBoCGw7Y0JRYCS98ldpIoTpOsAa-DUVIJ2oAG
PPCiA9m4YMLPObfd8cTiGKpCVzjk2ipIRgqZoBEqEysPuHVVxp7XFRAYJFrr
hLYsAIgrMJ6melSJBtmRZoCjBs9eiIuBLF6lt1Y77rbtRd_VRCy6aTXhz_AD
VvHfM7tkLITnmVH4xXKuEIBCyahOa9q085a2TV0tQT4AmYlhKVrKzGbNg86u
LdNhCrseGexosr1PtWq_xpZvb-vWFn4UrFfTXODs05FbNKSN7poYZ-SJm0_r
oQVnK4HLOJyJO6cK8o7rDR2qz1BPTP1z9L2rkuCMhphFJ7f6KN6sYE270e_E
EwT4gB64CqVZf0Nvsq4gwOs9zCoHdc2dluU5xkSGapFepnggFBC9xci8yuJe
SsV0nmMX84W4qRT9Qu7x9UbE15Wt-btKDn-t9aGRJcNmu9diDomOZ3YM9u6s
hEDT3ppZZAtZFjNe6vxv36kUf26xTzasforOaaOpEuZOtXJK3ayE0Z5qwaax
CwFFliB-pG7pQmoIZgpspZGFF7W2bbN3_u-X_VGXgBkzpMBX6Iry4-DjdrKc
LqOLUApWYAsEy6DP1oqUIQsQzLJoyEhCRQSf6uosUfFFYAg94I8tkHgOjaVT
K3IRr0J_DF4zUMjHarf4awz222iGCOIDPgkBUrM8F_mcyvofFwOlVJUAWvNf
vv1IPqkSkkJaReOF4cTHf0nDEYTXfDLWGcg2KN3lTbGGvpoK_dVIO4MMrVkk
1ZUIPfawS9ny26qaEwoy25o6hwRLtZiavpi5dJolve_BT6kAbuPGsCCbCeX2
vSXjvlw4JW88MEcna2Wo7SIy8LXYT3nSXAKP-CYAEKih9dGMQ14zr9ukuaXX
i8lBCZXbFHpvAgyrKQeeeRtkLYpE-h9g-gARgsUokQL1XrDBLLhyaz1gaVJM
MIP2fhnyywJSXgGUW9QTklObZDbMiYDVAY8uMyzk0hscHwt6uYnwM_HrrAt2
V-fG0TGd6-PHghpqfj1sQ6RebPnGXSmRoXku91bcLHQf7MMKB-CPVjP1WZ1E
Hy7H93dTys7eLQ7g8CxuTOxby9mtAliU6Vn0IRjkvUt8YK9PuVAwW_TW5nrO
RzoHJBl3lnbX3wv7LOEG7dLOSnog4MJzbHzwQf8e6iVVQFJwDfy6ET6CIHbV
74zUeY3j7aua6bbK-tBWLUZNRx0=
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
DRIVING ON WARDEN BETWEEN THE 4O1 RAMP AND FINCH...
A MAINLY CHINESE POPULATED AREA, NO LESS THAN 8 CARS CUT EXTREMELY CLOSE BEHIND ME, ALL BUT TOUCHING MY BUMPER. THIS IS A LESS THAN 5 KM DRIVE. THE SAME HAPPENED SEVERAL TIMES ON THE HIGHWAY. ONE PERSON ACTUALLY TRIED TO PASS ME ON THE ACCESS RAMP TO THE HIGHWAY.
INTERESTINGLY, I HAD POSTED THIS VIDEO ON THE UTUBE RECENTLY:
http://www.youtube.com/user/MsEYEOPENER#p/u/15/UebOBRLy3A4
INTERESTINGLY, I HAD POSTED THIS VIDEO ON THE UTUBE RECENTLY:
http://www.youtube.com/user/MsEYEOPENER#p/u/15/UebOBRLy3A4
LRAD IN USE IN PITTSBURG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpCyiUeTy60&feature=related
RADIATION AROUND HEAD IS HIGH AT 25 BAMBURGH CIRCLE TORONTO AND LEFT EAR IS REALLY REALLY PAINFUL
RADIATION AROUND HEAD IS HIGH AT 25 BAMBURGH CIRCLE TORONTO AND LEFT EAR IS REALLY REALLY PAINFUL
IT IS ALSO INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT THE RADIATION LEVEL IN MY UNIT...
INCREASES DRAMATICALLY EACH TIME I TALK ABOUT ANYTHING NEGATIVE THAT IS HAPPENING AT 25 BAMBURGH CIRCLE. IT IS ALSO INTERESTING TO NOTE, THAT WHEN I BLOG OR WRITE NOTES TO MANAGMENT THAT INVOLVES THE WAY EMPLOYEES ARE DOING THEIR WORK, I TEND TO SEE THOSE EMPLOYEES POPPING UP ANYWHERE I GO IN THE COMPOUND TIME AND TIME AGAIN. THEY ALSO SHOW UP OUTSIDE MY WINDOW TALKING REALLY LOUDLY OR OUTSIDE MY DOOR TALKING REALLY LOUDLY.
YESTERDAY ENTERING INTO THE COMPOUND, TWO PROPERTY MANAGERS WERE AT THE ENTRY GATE WITH A GROUP OF RESIDENTS. ONE WAS SITTING IN HIS BLUE CAR IN THE EXIT LANE FACING THE ROAD, AND THE OTHER CROSSED IN FRONT OF MY CAR AS THE GATE LIFTED FOR ME TO DRIVE INTO THE COMPOUND. HE DID NOT HAVE A PRETTY LOOK ON HIS FACE, HE WAS GLOWERING. I GUESS HE WAS NOT HAPPY WITH SOMEONE HE WAS DEALING WITH.
AS SOON AS I DROVE THROUGH THE GATE THE GROUP DISPERSED.
PS A CAR ALARM IS GOING OFF OUTSIDE MY WINDOW AS I AM TYPING THIS.
YESTERDAY ENTERING INTO THE COMPOUND, TWO PROPERTY MANAGERS WERE AT THE ENTRY GATE WITH A GROUP OF RESIDENTS. ONE WAS SITTING IN HIS BLUE CAR IN THE EXIT LANE FACING THE ROAD, AND THE OTHER CROSSED IN FRONT OF MY CAR AS THE GATE LIFTED FOR ME TO DRIVE INTO THE COMPOUND. HE DID NOT HAVE A PRETTY LOOK ON HIS FACE, HE WAS GLOWERING. I GUESS HE WAS NOT HAPPY WITH SOMEONE HE WAS DEALING WITH.
AS SOON AS I DROVE THROUGH THE GATE THE GROUP DISPERSED.
PS A CAR ALARM IS GOING OFF OUTSIDE MY WINDOW AS I AM TYPING THIS.
THE LIGHTS GO OFF OVER MY CAR AND...
A few days ago the overhead light near my car has been going off when I drive under it in the underground parking. This happened a few times before, but in those instances the building manager was seen walking from the electrical control unit in the basement, so I presumed he was experimenting with and testing the bulb - and I just happened to be there when he was doing so on several occasions.
However, last week when this started happening again I did not see him, but what was interesting was that the lights came back on after I passed under it.
I AM IN THE PROCESS OF WRITING A NOTE TO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,BUT SINCE I SEEM TO BE SEEING THE PROPERTY MANAGER QUITE A BIT AROUND ME RECENTLY, ALONG WITH THE ROTATING MANAGER, MAYBE I WILL MENTION IT VERBALLY.
ON THE TOPIC OF LIGHT BULBS, I ENTERED MY CAR CAR ON ONE OF THE DAYS THAT I EXPERIENCED THE ABOVE,(LAST WEEK) AND LIGHTS INSIDE MY CAR WAS ON. I AM METICULOUS IN CHECKING EVERY TIME I LOCK AND LEAVE MY CAR UNDERGROUND. MY CONCLUSION IS THAT MY CAR HAS BEEN ENTERED, SINCE THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE, AND GARBAGE WAS LEFT INSIDE MY CAR ALONG WITH DIRT. THERE WAS ALSO DIRT OUTSIDE MY CAR ON THOSE OCASSIONS. I HAVE NOTHING IN MY CAR TO STEAL REALLY, HOWEVER I DID NOTICE A FEW ITEMS OUT OF PLACE. I DID NOT DO A REPORT OF THIS SINCE I HAVE MENTIONED ON OTHER OCCASIONS TO MANAGEMENT THAT THIS HAS BEEN HAPPENING. SINCE NOTHING HAS BEEN TAKEN, THERE IS NOTHING TO TELL THE POLICE AND I DO NOT HAVE ANY PROOF OF ENTRY OTHER THAN A LIGHT BEING LEFT ON. HOWEVER, IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT THE LIGHTS AROUND MY PARKING SPOT HAS BEEN GOING ON AND OFF WHEN I DRIVE UNDER THAM, ABOUT THE SAME TIME I DISCOVERED THAT THE LIGHTS INSIDE CAR WAS ON.
However, last week when this started happening again I did not see him, but what was interesting was that the lights came back on after I passed under it.
I AM IN THE PROCESS OF WRITING A NOTE TO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,BUT SINCE I SEEM TO BE SEEING THE PROPERTY MANAGER QUITE A BIT AROUND ME RECENTLY, ALONG WITH THE ROTATING MANAGER, MAYBE I WILL MENTION IT VERBALLY.
ON THE TOPIC OF LIGHT BULBS, I ENTERED MY CAR CAR ON ONE OF THE DAYS THAT I EXPERIENCED THE ABOVE,(LAST WEEK) AND LIGHTS INSIDE MY CAR WAS ON. I AM METICULOUS IN CHECKING EVERY TIME I LOCK AND LEAVE MY CAR UNDERGROUND. MY CONCLUSION IS THAT MY CAR HAS BEEN ENTERED, SINCE THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE, AND GARBAGE WAS LEFT INSIDE MY CAR ALONG WITH DIRT. THERE WAS ALSO DIRT OUTSIDE MY CAR ON THOSE OCASSIONS. I HAVE NOTHING IN MY CAR TO STEAL REALLY, HOWEVER I DID NOTICE A FEW ITEMS OUT OF PLACE. I DID NOT DO A REPORT OF THIS SINCE I HAVE MENTIONED ON OTHER OCCASIONS TO MANAGEMENT THAT THIS HAS BEEN HAPPENING. SINCE NOTHING HAS BEEN TAKEN, THERE IS NOTHING TO TELL THE POLICE AND I DO NOT HAVE ANY PROOF OF ENTRY OTHER THAN A LIGHT BEING LEFT ON. HOWEVER, IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT THE LIGHTS AROUND MY PARKING SPOT HAS BEEN GOING ON AND OFF WHEN I DRIVE UNDER THAM, ABOUT THE SAME TIME I DISCOVERED THAT THE LIGHTS INSIDE CAR WAS ON.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Psychiatry Enters Dangerous Territory
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/3586-psychiatry-enters-dangerous-territory
excerpted from above link:
.
Psychiatry Enters Dangerous Territory
Print
E-mail
Written by Bruce Walker
Thursday, 20 May 2010 15:40
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/3586-psychiatry-enters-dangerous-territory';
tweetmeme_source = 'NewAmericanMag';
tweetme_window = 'new';
tweetme_bgcolor = '#ffffff';
tweetmeme_source = 'NewAmericanMag';
tweetme_title = 'Psychiatry Enters Dangerous Territory';
The new fourth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) published by the American Psychiatric Association may define several new psychiatric disorders. Some of these do not sound like varieties of mental illness at all, but rather opinions and attitudes. What would “oppositional defiant disorder,” for example, represent?
According to the new edition of the Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, this would include those who have “negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures.” Other varieties of newly created mental illnesses included being antisocial, arrogant, or cynical.
Those familiar with psychiatry in the Soviet Union will cringe at this sort of neo-psychiatry. Authority, for example, may often be wrong in a society. The right to contend with authority has long been considered a primary right of a free people. Soviet psychiatrists, however, institutionalized and “treated” those who defied Soviet authority, which was considered, per se, a variety of mental illness.
Cynicism is often the most sensible attitude of those who find government and politics to be a cesspool of corruption. The presumption that society and government are functioning properly, which is implicit in these new psychiatric “disorders,” looks very Orwellian. Only the dullest mind, or the most sheepish people, can look at our tax code, our school system, our immigration policies, and our foreign policy and see only goodness and wisdom.
Psychiatric opinions can have a dramatic impact upon court rulings. Laws are often built around those opinions: the right to bear arms, for example, is denied to those who have a history of mental illness. What if that mental illness is defined as a profound distrust of government in America? Then government would have the right to disarm those who saw something very wrong in our political system.
Many parents already worry about the over-medication of children, who may well be the first group diagnosed under these new standards. Eccentric children have often been the greatest men in history. Mozart, for example, was hyperactive (by today’s standards) and approached music differently than conventional composers did. Did he have a mental illness? Or was he rather, as the Pope who knew him said, “Amadeus” — Beloved of God? How about Capablanca, the greatest child chess prodigy in history? Was he mentally ill?
Both of those men led relatively conventional lives, but what about men like Newton and Beethoven, who were considered to be misanthropic. Was this mental illness, which must be treated with therapy and drugs? Or was it, rather, the expected response of geniuses living among men of much weaker minds? Treating such unique men with drugs and therapy might deprive mankind of its greatest innovators and analysts.
The politics of collectivism permeates every aspect of modern life. Individuality, uniqueness, privacy, and separation are inherent rights of free men. These are also anathema to collectivism, which views us all as interchangeable parts of a vast, impersonal, statist machine. Psychiatry which does not account for the particular nature of each of us is not medicine and it is not science: it is simply collectivism lathered on something called medical science.
excerpted from above link:
.
Psychiatry Enters Dangerous Territory
Written by Bruce Walker
Thursday, 20 May 2010 15:40
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/3586-psychiatry-enters-dangerous-territory';
tweetmeme_source = 'NewAmericanMag';
tweetme_window = 'new';
tweetme_bgcolor = '#ffffff';
tweetmeme_source = 'NewAmericanMag';
tweetme_title = 'Psychiatry Enters Dangerous Territory';
The new fourth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) published by the American Psychiatric Association may define several new psychiatric disorders. Some of these do not sound like varieties of mental illness at all, but rather opinions and attitudes. What would “oppositional defiant disorder,” for example, represent?
According to the new edition of the Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, this would include those who have “negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures.” Other varieties of newly created mental illnesses included being antisocial, arrogant, or cynical.
Those familiar with psychiatry in the Soviet Union will cringe at this sort of neo-psychiatry. Authority, for example, may often be wrong in a society. The right to contend with authority has long been considered a primary right of a free people. Soviet psychiatrists, however, institutionalized and “treated” those who defied Soviet authority, which was considered, per se, a variety of mental illness.
Cynicism is often the most sensible attitude of those who find government and politics to be a cesspool of corruption. The presumption that society and government are functioning properly, which is implicit in these new psychiatric “disorders,” looks very Orwellian. Only the dullest mind, or the most sheepish people, can look at our tax code, our school system, our immigration policies, and our foreign policy and see only goodness and wisdom.
Psychiatric opinions can have a dramatic impact upon court rulings. Laws are often built around those opinions: the right to bear arms, for example, is denied to those who have a history of mental illness. What if that mental illness is defined as a profound distrust of government in America? Then government would have the right to disarm those who saw something very wrong in our political system.
Many parents already worry about the over-medication of children, who may well be the first group diagnosed under these new standards. Eccentric children have often been the greatest men in history. Mozart, for example, was hyperactive (by today’s standards) and approached music differently than conventional composers did. Did he have a mental illness? Or was he rather, as the Pope who knew him said, “Amadeus” — Beloved of God? How about Capablanca, the greatest child chess prodigy in history? Was he mentally ill?
Both of those men led relatively conventional lives, but what about men like Newton and Beethoven, who were considered to be misanthropic. Was this mental illness, which must be treated with therapy and drugs? Or was it, rather, the expected response of geniuses living among men of much weaker minds? Treating such unique men with drugs and therapy might deprive mankind of its greatest innovators and analysts.
The politics of collectivism permeates every aspect of modern life. Individuality, uniqueness, privacy, and separation are inherent rights of free men. These are also anathema to collectivism, which views us all as interchangeable parts of a vast, impersonal, statist machine. Psychiatry which does not account for the particular nature of each of us is not medicine and it is not science: it is simply collectivism lathered on something called medical science.
Monday, May 17, 2010
5 MASSAGE EQUIPMENT LATER....
In the last few months I have had 5 massages go bad on me.
Today while using the last one, IT JUST STOPPED WORKING. I CHECKED AND PLUG, IT WAS FINE - THE INFRARED HEAT WAS WORKING BUT NOT THE MASSAGE ITSELF.
IT JUST STOPPED WHILE I WAS USING IT.
HMMMM, KEEPING IN MIND THAT 4 OTHERS FAILED THE SAME WAY, DOES REMOTE TAMPERING COMES TO MIND????
I HAVE READ THAT EM PULSES COULD KILL A CAR'S ELECTRICAL SYSTEM WHILE IT IS BEING DRIVEN, SO OF COURSE ANY ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS AT RISK FOR THE SAME TYPE OF ATTACK.
http://gizmodo.com/5454295/this-emp-cannon-stops-cars-almost-instantly
http://www.zgeek.com/archive/index.php/t-20059.html
Today while using the last one, IT JUST STOPPED WORKING. I CHECKED AND PLUG, IT WAS FINE - THE INFRARED HEAT WAS WORKING BUT NOT THE MASSAGE ITSELF.
IT JUST STOPPED WHILE I WAS USING IT.
HMMMM, KEEPING IN MIND THAT 4 OTHERS FAILED THE SAME WAY, DOES REMOTE TAMPERING COMES TO MIND????
I HAVE READ THAT EM PULSES COULD KILL A CAR'S ELECTRICAL SYSTEM WHILE IT IS BEING DRIVEN, SO OF COURSE ANY ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS AT RISK FOR THE SAME TYPE OF ATTACK.
http://gizmodo.com/5454295/this-emp-cannon-stops-cars-almost-instantly
http://www.zgeek.com/archive/index.php/t-20059.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)