Wednesday, April 21, 2010
THE SIDE STREET I LIVE ON IS A HIGHWAY..
I NOTICED THAT THIS TIME OF NIGHT MY STREET IS VERY VERY BUSY - NORMALLY ALMOST NO TRAFFIC. (OR MAYBE I JUST NOTICE IT WHEN I AM AT THE WINDOW - NORMALLY IT IS VERY QUIET AT 9PM)
THE MISUSE OF CODE 5150
http://gunowners.org/ne0709.htm
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
U of San Francisco Prof. (A Psychologist & Attorney) Shows Risks For Californians
Hello Larry,
I would like to relate to you the general mechanism which under California’s Welfare and Institutions code sections 5150 and 8102 lead to unwarranted gun confiscation.
Following I have attached a short general scenario (Keep and Bear Arms), the petition in the present case along with the related Points and Authorities and “evidence” as well as the psychiatric evaluation. Further I have provided copies of the relevant statutes.
The typical situation is where someone is accused of acting unstable or in a manner which might be deemed, by someone, as being a danger to himself or others. Under 5150, this is ground for taking the person into a 72 hour involuntary observation during which time a mental health professional observes and evaluates the person. If the person is deemed to be a danger, then the 72 hour hold can be extended. If the person is not so deemed, they are released.
The fine print of 5150 is included in my attachments.
Once the 5150 has been effected, 8102 states that firearms in possession, etc. can be confiscated. This us typically done with the “permission” of anyone else who might give permission to the authorities to “take the weapons for safekeeping.” This in itself if absurd. If the person who is a danger is removed under 5150, how can the presence of weapons be a danger? Well, someone might posit, upon the return of the person, there would be a danger. But, on the other hand, the 5150, if ended within the 72 hours, deems in itself, that the person is NOT a danger, so the return would not be a danger. At the end of the first paragraph of 8100 it states that “A person is not subject to this subdivision [prohibition of possession etc. of firearms] once he or she is discharged from the facility.” This seems to contradict 8102. If the provision is then terminated, on what ground do the authorities have for keeping the firearms and requiring a hearing for the return of firearms for a person who has been evaluated and released? This is a fool’s logic, but one which is stripping people of their property outside of the authority of law.
It might be argued, that because there is the option of a hearing, the law provides a reasoned avenue for that person to regain possession. Why it is fair for a person who has had property seized outside of the authority of law to have to come to a hearing to argue for the return of his property? But there is a problem with the hearing itself. In order for the seized weapons to be returned, it is not the government which must show that the person is a danger to himself or others, but rather the judge (yes, only a judge, no jury) must be convinced by a preponderance of the evidence that the person will NOT be a danger to himself or others. What has happened to the “presumed” innocent (or in this case competent) until proven otherwise? In this situation, the judge must be convinced, not of incompetence (the argument of the prosecution), but rather of competence, the argument the person must make. This is a dire reversal of our typical Constitutional rights. But, there is yet another twist. This is NOT a trial, and perhaps not even a superior court proceeding, but might be deemed, instead, an administrative hearing. Superior court proceedings are governed by the Constitution and accompanying rights; the right to confront our accusers, included. On the other hand, typical protective procedures mandated under the Constitution are NOT required in administrative hearings. For example, the judge is free to consider written statements from witnesses not present for cross-examination. So, if the underlying 5150 and the subsequent confiscation is based upon questionable out of court statements, the accused can be denied the chance to test the veracity of the statements in court.
This is a serious problem when something as important as Constitutionally protected property and Second Amendment rights are being denied.
Further, the standards of 5150 are ambiguous at best. What does it mean to be a danger to himself or others? There is no behavioral standard stated in the code for this assessment. A lot of what we do on a daily basis, whereas considered safe by us, might be deemed a danger to ourselves or others. Does this warrant being interred for involuntary observation and perhaps losing Second Amendment Rights? For instance, some people drive while tired. This might be a danger to others. Doing this on a regular basis might be seen by some as being indicative of an ongoing mental problem, maybe even to the point of a 5150. What about smoking? What about crossing the street without looking both ways? If these are seen as being a danger to onself or to others, poorly written 5150 can provide authority for 72 evaluation and perhaps institutionalization. Because 8102 DOES NOT require a firearms related 5150 to take effect, a 5150 for any purpose can lead to firearms confiscation. So, it is possible, that any “dangerous” behavior might lead to firearm confiscation. The present use of W&I 8102 coupled with 5150 is indeed insidious. Clearly this cannot be the overt intent of the legislature.
It is not unreasonable that people who have been duly adjudicated in Constitutionally protected superior court proceedings as being a danger to themselves or others to be limited in their access to lethal force. On the other hand, the misuse of 5150 coupled with 8102 enables law enforcement to seize property and the courts to deny Second Amendment rights based upon the mere unfounded transient accusation of any danger whatsoever, regardless as to how remote from the possession of firearms.
Are we devolving to a position where the mere desire to own firearms will be deemed as evidence of being a danger, and therefore firearms being prohibited from anyone who wants them?
The NRA’s current position on the pending bill would, it appears, provide for all courts and law enforcement across the country, the tools which are now so readily abused by those institutions in California.
How great is the siren song of safety. Who was it that said that those who are willing to trade freedom for security are worthy of neither?
I hope this material is informative
Please let me know the next step. Let’s try to effect some good.
Regards,
W. Michael Becker, Ph.D., J.D., Licensed Psychologist, Attorney at Law
Prof. Mgt & Law, University of San Francisco.
TO: GOA, c/o Larry Pratt
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
U of San Francisco Prof. (A Psychologist & Attorney) Shows Risks For Californians
Hello Larry,
I would like to relate to you the general mechanism which under California’s Welfare and Institutions code sections 5150 and 8102 lead to unwarranted gun confiscation.
Following I have attached a short general scenario (Keep and Bear Arms), the petition in the present case along with the related Points and Authorities and “evidence” as well as the psychiatric evaluation. Further I have provided copies of the relevant statutes.
The typical situation is where someone is accused of acting unstable or in a manner which might be deemed, by someone, as being a danger to himself or others. Under 5150, this is ground for taking the person into a 72 hour involuntary observation during which time a mental health professional observes and evaluates the person. If the person is deemed to be a danger, then the 72 hour hold can be extended. If the person is not so deemed, they are released.
The fine print of 5150 is included in my attachments.
Once the 5150 has been effected, 8102 states that firearms in possession, etc. can be confiscated. This us typically done with the “permission” of anyone else who might give permission to the authorities to “take the weapons for safekeeping.” This in itself if absurd. If the person who is a danger is removed under 5150, how can the presence of weapons be a danger? Well, someone might posit, upon the return of the person, there would be a danger. But, on the other hand, the 5150, if ended within the 72 hours, deems in itself, that the person is NOT a danger, so the return would not be a danger. At the end of the first paragraph of 8100 it states that “A person is not subject to this subdivision [prohibition of possession etc. of firearms] once he or she is discharged from the facility.” This seems to contradict 8102. If the provision is then terminated, on what ground do the authorities have for keeping the firearms and requiring a hearing for the return of firearms for a person who has been evaluated and released? This is a fool’s logic, but one which is stripping people of their property outside of the authority of law.
It might be argued, that because there is the option of a hearing, the law provides a reasoned avenue for that person to regain possession. Why it is fair for a person who has had property seized outside of the authority of law to have to come to a hearing to argue for the return of his property? But there is a problem with the hearing itself. In order for the seized weapons to be returned, it is not the government which must show that the person is a danger to himself or others, but rather the judge (yes, only a judge, no jury) must be convinced by a preponderance of the evidence that the person will NOT be a danger to himself or others. What has happened to the “presumed” innocent (or in this case competent) until proven otherwise? In this situation, the judge must be convinced, not of incompetence (the argument of the prosecution), but rather of competence, the argument the person must make. This is a dire reversal of our typical Constitutional rights. But, there is yet another twist. This is NOT a trial, and perhaps not even a superior court proceeding, but might be deemed, instead, an administrative hearing. Superior court proceedings are governed by the Constitution and accompanying rights; the right to confront our accusers, included. On the other hand, typical protective procedures mandated under the Constitution are NOT required in administrative hearings. For example, the judge is free to consider written statements from witnesses not present for cross-examination. So, if the underlying 5150 and the subsequent confiscation is based upon questionable out of court statements, the accused can be denied the chance to test the veracity of the statements in court.
This is a serious problem when something as important as Constitutionally protected property and Second Amendment rights are being denied.
Further, the standards of 5150 are ambiguous at best. What does it mean to be a danger to himself or others? There is no behavioral standard stated in the code for this assessment. A lot of what we do on a daily basis, whereas considered safe by us, might be deemed a danger to ourselves or others. Does this warrant being interred for involuntary observation and perhaps losing Second Amendment Rights? For instance, some people drive while tired. This might be a danger to others. Doing this on a regular basis might be seen by some as being indicative of an ongoing mental problem, maybe even to the point of a 5150. What about smoking? What about crossing the street without looking both ways? If these are seen as being a danger to onself or to others, poorly written 5150 can provide authority for 72 evaluation and perhaps institutionalization. Because 8102 DOES NOT require a firearms related 5150 to take effect, a 5150 for any purpose can lead to firearms confiscation. So, it is possible, that any “dangerous” behavior might lead to firearm confiscation. The present use of W&I 8102 coupled with 5150 is indeed insidious. Clearly this cannot be the overt intent of the legislature.
It is not unreasonable that people who have been duly adjudicated in Constitutionally protected superior court proceedings as being a danger to themselves or others to be limited in their access to lethal force. On the other hand, the misuse of 5150 coupled with 8102 enables law enforcement to seize property and the courts to deny Second Amendment rights based upon the mere unfounded transient accusation of any danger whatsoever, regardless as to how remote from the possession of firearms.
Are we devolving to a position where the mere desire to own firearms will be deemed as evidence of being a danger, and therefore firearms being prohibited from anyone who wants them?
The NRA’s current position on the pending bill would, it appears, provide for all courts and law enforcement across the country, the tools which are now so readily abused by those institutions in California.
How great is the siren song of safety. Who was it that said that those who are willing to trade freedom for security are worthy of neither?
I hope this material is informative
Please let me know the next step. Let’s try to effect some good.
Regards,
W. Michael Becker, Ph.D., J.D., Licensed Psychologist, Attorney at Law
Prof. Mgt & Law, University of San Francisco.
TO: GOA, c/o Larry Pratt
BPD Officer Melissa Kelly Abuses 5150 protocol
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/01/09/18634787.php
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
BPD Officer Melissa Kelly Abuses 5150 protocol.
by WhoWatchesTheWatchmen Saturday Jan 9th, 2010 8:36 AM
This is a portion of a medical record from Alta Bates Hospital in Berkeley. This is medical documentation generated due to a fake 5150 called in by Berkeley Police Officer Melissa Kelly back on December 3rd. The medical report clearly notes that there was no medical situation. No unusual behaviours or symptoms. The patient is in normal health. Officer Kelly set in motion a fake 5150 call out of anger, out of spite. The Officer is in clear abuse of police powers, in particular the 5150 protocol which is a medical protocol designed to help people who actually need psychiatric help. Officer Melissa Kelly manipulated pseudo-psychiatry; she used a medical protocol as a weapon.
Both the Berkeley Police (headed by Michael Meehan) and Berkeley Mental Health have been stonewalling an investigation into the broad misuse of the 5150 protocol. There has been a sharp increase in the use of the 5150 protocol. Officers have been reporting fake 5150s just to get rid of people they have personal grudges with. Out of their own whims, Berkeley police officers have been creating their own pseudo-psychology in attempts to mark people as mentally unstable and a danger to the community. Aside from the harassment related to being abducted by police and EMTs, these fake 5150s generate medical bills for individuals that on average total over $1,500. On December 3rd of 2009, Officer Melissa Kelly called in a fake 5150. She ordered the EMTs who arrived at the scene in People's Park to send the individual to John George hospital. The officer reported psychotic behaviours, insisting that the individual was an extreme danger to the community as well as himself. Officer Melissa Kelly demanded at least a 72 hour hold in the psychiatric facility, adding that the individual should be watched under maximum security. The EMTs did not comply with police orders noting that nothing seemed to be wrong. Instead the individual was sent to receive a quick check-up at Alta Bates (the hospital is near People's Park). The stay at Alta Bates lasted less than two hours, hardly the over 72 hours the officer adamantly requested. The medical report from Alta Bates notes that "all symptoms are... negative." The report notes "no anxiety, anger, unusual behaviour or suicidal thoughts". The report clarifies "no drugs", "wasn't threatening [police]", and explains that the 5150 was called in because of a simple dispute between the officers and the individual ("said something mean"). The only thing noted in the reported is the patient being agitated for having to go through the whole ordeal. The police have refused to hand over the police report related to this particular 5150 to the individual. Serious medical resources are being used to detain and harass people in Berkeley. Not only does this violate the rights of the individual but it clogs hospitals, distracts doctors, and uses ambulances that should be responding to true emergencies. Medical facilities are not prisons; they are not meant to hold people that cops have person grievances with. More broadly, Officer Melissa Kelly used a police radio to call in a fake emergency, which is in violation of the law. Whether it be a fake medical situation, or a fake fire, or a fake crime, it is not within the law for an officer to call in a fake emergency situation. Berkeley police have made it clear that they will continue to misuse the 5150 protocol as well keep the police reports regarding these fake emergencies from public scrutiny. Berkeley Police have made it clear they will continue to randomly label people as psychotic, insane or otherwise out of their own personal agenda. This continuance is alarming, and puts people at risk.
by KonsiderTuesday Jan 19th, 2010 12:05 AM
-->
The reason for police frequently utilizing the method of attributing insanity to people who they happen to dislike for whatever reason, dissent in particular, is a major indication of the disconnect between the police and those they are supposedly sworn to protect. Or perhaps it might be more accurate to describe methods--such as potentially putting a perfectly sane person in a mental hospital by calling in a 5150, or putting an innocent person on death row by contriving evidence--as an indication of a connection. The popular knowledge that law enforcement is "police business", with no room for inquiry, or even recognition, is an understanding that criticism wont be tolerated, and dissent will be punished. This silencing is at the core of the connection between the police and the public, between law and its enforcement in US society.
Add a Comment
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
BPD Officer Melissa Kelly Abuses 5150 protocol.
by WhoWatchesTheWatchmen Saturday Jan 9th, 2010 8:36 AM
This is a portion of a medical record from Alta Bates Hospital in Berkeley. This is medical documentation generated due to a fake 5150 called in by Berkeley Police Officer Melissa Kelly back on December 3rd. The medical report clearly notes that there was no medical situation. No unusual behaviours or symptoms. The patient is in normal health. Officer Kelly set in motion a fake 5150 call out of anger, out of spite. The Officer is in clear abuse of police powers, in particular the 5150 protocol which is a medical protocol designed to help people who actually need psychiatric help. Officer Melissa Kelly manipulated pseudo-psychiatry; she used a medical protocol as a weapon.
Both the Berkeley Police (headed by Michael Meehan) and Berkeley Mental Health have been stonewalling an investigation into the broad misuse of the 5150 protocol. There has been a sharp increase in the use of the 5150 protocol. Officers have been reporting fake 5150s just to get rid of people they have personal grudges with. Out of their own whims, Berkeley police officers have been creating their own pseudo-psychology in attempts to mark people as mentally unstable and a danger to the community. Aside from the harassment related to being abducted by police and EMTs, these fake 5150s generate medical bills for individuals that on average total over $1,500. On December 3rd of 2009, Officer Melissa Kelly called in a fake 5150. She ordered the EMTs who arrived at the scene in People's Park to send the individual to John George hospital. The officer reported psychotic behaviours, insisting that the individual was an extreme danger to the community as well as himself. Officer Melissa Kelly demanded at least a 72 hour hold in the psychiatric facility, adding that the individual should be watched under maximum security. The EMTs did not comply with police orders noting that nothing seemed to be wrong. Instead the individual was sent to receive a quick check-up at Alta Bates (the hospital is near People's Park). The stay at Alta Bates lasted less than two hours, hardly the over 72 hours the officer adamantly requested. The medical report from Alta Bates notes that "all symptoms are... negative." The report notes "no anxiety, anger, unusual behaviour or suicidal thoughts". The report clarifies "no drugs", "wasn't threatening [police]", and explains that the 5150 was called in because of a simple dispute between the officers and the individual ("said something mean"). The only thing noted in the reported is the patient being agitated for having to go through the whole ordeal. The police have refused to hand over the police report related to this particular 5150 to the individual. Serious medical resources are being used to detain and harass people in Berkeley. Not only does this violate the rights of the individual but it clogs hospitals, distracts doctors, and uses ambulances that should be responding to true emergencies. Medical facilities are not prisons; they are not meant to hold people that cops have person grievances with. More broadly, Officer Melissa Kelly used a police radio to call in a fake emergency, which is in violation of the law. Whether it be a fake medical situation, or a fake fire, or a fake crime, it is not within the law for an officer to call in a fake emergency situation. Berkeley police have made it clear that they will continue to misuse the 5150 protocol as well keep the police reports regarding these fake emergencies from public scrutiny. Berkeley Police have made it clear they will continue to randomly label people as psychotic, insane or otherwise out of their own personal agenda. This continuance is alarming, and puts people at risk.
by KonsiderTuesday Jan 19th, 2010 12:05 AM
-->
The reason for police frequently utilizing the method of attributing insanity to people who they happen to dislike for whatever reason, dissent in particular, is a major indication of the disconnect between the police and those they are supposedly sworn to protect. Or perhaps it might be more accurate to describe methods--such as potentially putting a perfectly sane person in a mental hospital by calling in a 5150, or putting an innocent person on death row by contriving evidence--as an indication of a connection. The popular knowledge that law enforcement is "police business", with no room for inquiry, or even recognition, is an understanding that criticism wont be tolerated, and dissent will be punished. This silencing is at the core of the connection between the police and the public, between law and its enforcement in US society.
Add a Comment
BUILDING CLEANERS WALKS BY DOOR AS SOON AS I OPEN IT
TO IS BECOMING A WEIRD ROUTINE- I GO TO MY DOOR AND OPEN IT AND A FEMALE CHINESE BUILDING CLEANER WALKS BY - WITH SUCH PRECISION IT BLOWS MY MIND. THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH THIS HAPPENS IS VERY VERY STRANGE. JUST AS STRANGE AS THE BUILDING MANAGER SHOWING UP UNDERGROUD EACH TIME TO GO TO MY CAR - HAPPENED FOR YEARS UNTIL I COMPLAINED IN WRITING TO THE PROPERTY MANAGER- THEN IT STOPPED. NOW THE CLEANER IS STARTING TO DO THE SAME - IN FRONT OF MY DOOR.!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE FUNNY THING IS SHE WAS NOT CLEANING - JUST WALKING BY!!!!!!!!!
LOCATION: BAMBURGH CIRLCE TORONTO.
THE FUNNY THING IS SHE WAS NOT CLEANING - JUST WALKING BY!!!!!!!!!
LOCATION: BAMBURGH CIRLCE TORONTO.
MAYORAL CANDIDATE ALLEGES ASSAULTS WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
http://www.wlky.com/politics/22317065/detail.html
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Mayoral Candidate Alleges Surveillance, Assault
Connie Marshall Announces Candidacy
By Steve Burgin/WLKY
POSTED: 4:54 pm EST January 22, 2010UPDATED: 8:16 pm EST January 22, 2010
LOUISVILLE, Ky. --
Connie Marshall has filed several lawsuits against local, state and federal officials. She also claims there's a widespread conspiracy to keep her quiet.
She also wants to be Louisville's next mayor.
So who is Connie Marshall?
Raw Video: Connie Marshall Announces CandidacyRaw Video: Part 2 Connie Marshall Announces CandidacyRaw Video: Part 3 Connie Marshall Announces Candidacy
At a news conference Friday, Marshall, a Democrat, said she is a businesswoman with a background in real estate, and a civil rights activist. Right now, she's unemployed.
Marshall said she believes there's a campaign on behalf of corrupt officials to sabotage her campaign.
"I have no ties to special interest. I'm spiritual based. I believe in honestly, accountability and integrity," she said.
She's filed several lawsuits charging a widespread government cover-up, and that's one of the reasons she contends she's been assaulted 150 times.
"I have been assaulted on a regular basis through electromagnetic technology," she said. "That includes microwaving, intrasound, via satellites."
One lawsuit was filed against Louisville Gas & Electric, charging the utility with torturing and tormenting her by turning lights and other electrical appliances off and on.
"I've had four or five TVs destroyed, seven telephones or more, computers, fax machine, all those things destroyed," she said.
Marshall claimed an electric current coming through the phone caused her to have a paralyzed feeling.
The LG&E suit was dismissed with prejudice as frivolous.
Marshall also sued the U.S. attorney, the governor, the sheriff and the police chief claiming government waste and fraud, racism, physical and mental assault, and illegal incarceration.
Earlier this month, Marshall sued federal judges.
That suit accuses them of participating in and or willfully allowing gang stalking. She wants the judges impeached, incarcerated, and is seeking $20 million in damages.
Marshall said the government is also conspiring to break up families.
"My grandchildren were taken illegally by the state for federal funding and also abused in state care, beaten and illegally placed for adoption," she said.
She contends that, and the fact she was the victim of a hate crime, are motives behind the electronic attacks and illegal surveillance.
"I find my fight with the entire commonwealth of Kentucky, because of the complaints I filed against them, which are legitimate complaints," she said.
In addition to Marshall, the other Democrats running for mayor of Louisville are Tyler Allen, Greg Fischer, David Tandy, Shannon White and Burrel Farnsley, with Jim King is expected to file before the Tuesday deadline.
http://www.clipsyndicate.com/video/playlist/13492/1270950?title=truveo_full_feed
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Mayoral Candidate Alleges Surveillance, Assault
Connie Marshall Announces Candidacy
By Steve Burgin/WLKY
POSTED: 4:54 pm EST January 22, 2010UPDATED: 8:16 pm EST January 22, 2010
LOUISVILLE, Ky. --
Connie Marshall has filed several lawsuits against local, state and federal officials. She also claims there's a widespread conspiracy to keep her quiet.
She also wants to be Louisville's next mayor.
So who is Connie Marshall?
Raw Video: Connie Marshall Announces CandidacyRaw Video: Part 2 Connie Marshall Announces CandidacyRaw Video: Part 3 Connie Marshall Announces Candidacy
At a news conference Friday, Marshall, a Democrat, said she is a businesswoman with a background in real estate, and a civil rights activist. Right now, she's unemployed.
Marshall said she believes there's a campaign on behalf of corrupt officials to sabotage her campaign.
"I have no ties to special interest. I'm spiritual based. I believe in honestly, accountability and integrity," she said.
She's filed several lawsuits charging a widespread government cover-up, and that's one of the reasons she contends she's been assaulted 150 times.
"I have been assaulted on a regular basis through electromagnetic technology," she said. "That includes microwaving, intrasound, via satellites."
One lawsuit was filed against Louisville Gas & Electric, charging the utility with torturing and tormenting her by turning lights and other electrical appliances off and on.
"I've had four or five TVs destroyed, seven telephones or more, computers, fax machine, all those things destroyed," she said.
Marshall claimed an electric current coming through the phone caused her to have a paralyzed feeling.
The LG&E suit was dismissed with prejudice as frivolous.
Marshall also sued the U.S. attorney, the governor, the sheriff and the police chief claiming government waste and fraud, racism, physical and mental assault, and illegal incarceration.
Earlier this month, Marshall sued federal judges.
That suit accuses them of participating in and or willfully allowing gang stalking. She wants the judges impeached, incarcerated, and is seeking $20 million in damages.
Marshall said the government is also conspiring to break up families.
"My grandchildren were taken illegally by the state for federal funding and also abused in state care, beaten and illegally placed for adoption," she said.
She contends that, and the fact she was the victim of a hate crime, are motives behind the electronic attacks and illegal surveillance.
"I find my fight with the entire commonwealth of Kentucky, because of the complaints I filed against them, which are legitimate complaints," she said.
In addition to Marshall, the other Democrats running for mayor of Louisville are Tyler Allen, Greg Fischer, David Tandy, Shannon White and Burrel Farnsley, with Jim King is expected to file before the Tuesday deadline.
http://www.clipsyndicate.com/video/playlist/13492/1270950?title=truveo_full_feed
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
HARASSED AND TORTURED WITH MICROWAVES - VOTE CONNIE MARSHALL FOR MAYOR 2010
http://www.justiceforallcitizens.com/electromagneticvictim.html
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
.ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS, GANG STALKING, MIND CONTROL AND V2K (Voice to Skull
)On Friday, April 16, 2010, Derrick Robinson, President and Founder of Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance and several key speakers will be in Louisville, Kentucky to inform you about Electromagnetic Assault, Gang Stalking, Mind Control and V2K (Voice to Skull). The Guest List includes, Rep. Jim Guest - Missouri House of Representatives, Dr. John Hall - Author, A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America, Keith Labella - Attorney, Michael Lauria - Commercial Airline Pilot, ret., Katherine Moore - former Vice Mayor, Wilmington, NC, Robert Duncan O'Finioan - former Manchurian Candidate, Tim White - Telecommunications Engineer and several other distinguished guest which also includes victims of this crime.The press conference will be held on April 16, 2010 at 11:30 a.m. at Cornerstone Cottage, 3799 Bardstown Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40218. You may find out more information on the website of Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance. Website Address: freedomfchs.com
WHAT IS ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS, GANG STALKING, MIND CONTROL AND V2K (Voice to Skull)There are many scientific explanations of what this technology can do, I wanted to give you a simple explanation. I contacted Timothy White - in New York City, New York - Telecommunications Engineer and cognitive countermeasures' researcher to get an explanation anyone could understand and he stated the following:"Thousands of ordinary U.S. citizens have become non-consensual victims of extreme low frequency neurobiological experimentation designed for the development of weapons systems that can monitor, control and change the brain-wave activity of the average citizen. We (Tim is also a victim) are victims of a technological arms race for the remote control of the mind.The perpetrators of these crimes range from rogue elements of every level of government to corporations to private citizens. There are thousands of targeted victims across the country and the globe.
SOME OF THE WAYS YOU ARE TORTURED AND TORMENTED ARE AS FOLLOWS:The torture consist of body overheating, body extremely cold, seizures, heart pain, ear aches, itching behind eyes, burning behind eyes, targeting pain to individual parts of the body, swelling, headaches, hair coming out by the handfuls as if you have had chemotherapy, mind paralyses, being hypnotized or placed in a trance type state, being tracked through your body like an animal, etc., and can lead to undetectable death from heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms, etc.They also use sleep deprivation and constant harassment which makes it easier for the corrupt official to use mind control. V2K (voice to skull) and hologram type hallucinations are used to make the person appear to have a mental problem. They also induce sexual stimulation in the person and some have stated they may have been raped. The mind control can make a victim commit suicide and even commit murder. All electrical appliances are destroyed and car radios and even engines are destroyed. Cars are run off of the road and you are stalked and attacked constantly. All mail is intercepted (even registered, certified and express mail), birth certificates are changed and social security records are manipulated. Debts are increased, and jobs and businesses are destroyed. You are monitored and/or tracked by Drones (airborne cameras), satellites, and illegal audio and video in your home.All the time that this and more is happening to you, usually simultaneously, everyone is told that you have a mental problem or that you are under investigation.Washington has not given permission for any official on any level to commit these acts.
WHO ARE THE VICTIMS AND HOW WERE THEY CHOSEN?Though some victims are chosen randomly. Some of us have discovered that if we filed a complaint with a company, corrupt official, etc. we could become "Targeted." For example: Someone became targeted as a result of filing a complaint against a law firm. Another person became targeted because she filed against a dental office.We have also discovered that victims are all over the world national and international.
HOW DID I BECOME A VICTIM OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS AND GANG STALKING?I think I was chosen for the following reasons:1) My grandchildren were illegally taken by the state for federal funding and also because my younger grandchild (who had a problem with his intestines at the time) was being beaten and made to go without food in the foster home of Sherrika White. He was also tied to a tree. My older grandchild was putting food in his pockets to feed the younger grandchild. To cover up the crime the children were illegally placed for adoption by the state (Sky Tanghe and Mike Hartlage) and Judge Jerry Bowles (who was allowed to sit on the bench eventhough he had a problem with alcohol). The children were illegally adopted by a social worker (which is a conflict of interest) and placed on numerous drugs, (adderal, resperdal, topomax, depakote, amphetamine salts, etc.) and were taking approximately nine (9) pills per day.2) I have a cd from a forensic analyst of my coworkers, (Mark Yates, Will Beard and Wilma Wilke) discussing killing me and taking me to the KKK. They also discussed a woman that Mark Yates handcuffed in a building. Mark Yates is also discussing a list that I have been placed on and once you get put on this list all the money in the world won't save me, if they want you, you're gone. He also recruited for this at Blue Grass Automotive and I overheard him state, "This thing is bigger than the KKK, everybody is in this thing" Mark said his uncle is in it and he is a big time (some kind of official) in an office. He further stated, judges, policeman, doctors everybody is in this thing.I was also assaulted three (3) times by Tyler Stone and went to the hospital twice (once by ambulance). I also had bugs thrown in my hair. I also had to deal with Andy Vine (one of the owners) perverted email. I did not receive any assistance from the offices in Kentucky, which includes the FBI, EEOC, the Police, everything was covered up. I filed complaints against all of the above.3) Rev. Coleman (now deceased), Elizabeth Elliott, Daniel and Pena Cobble, Rose Perry, Russell Wickliffe and Vicki Page and I filed a class action lawsuit against several Federal Judges in Louisville, Kentucky. The reason the lawsuit was filed is because cases were being dismissed without any discovery, people that qualified for forma pauperis were not being allowed forma pauperis, cases were being signed by clerks and they would refuse to say who the judges on the cases were, cases are supposed to be assigned by the computer randomly however the same judges - mainly Judge Heyburn and Judge Simpson - would always get the cases, etc.I am still fighting all of the above issues.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
.ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS, GANG STALKING, MIND CONTROL AND V2K (Voice to Skull
)On Friday, April 16, 2010, Derrick Robinson, President and Founder of Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance and several key speakers will be in Louisville, Kentucky to inform you about Electromagnetic Assault, Gang Stalking, Mind Control and V2K (Voice to Skull). The Guest List includes, Rep. Jim Guest - Missouri House of Representatives, Dr. John Hall - Author, A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America, Keith Labella - Attorney, Michael Lauria - Commercial Airline Pilot, ret., Katherine Moore - former Vice Mayor, Wilmington, NC, Robert Duncan O'Finioan - former Manchurian Candidate, Tim White - Telecommunications Engineer and several other distinguished guest which also includes victims of this crime.The press conference will be held on April 16, 2010 at 11:30 a.m. at Cornerstone Cottage, 3799 Bardstown Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40218. You may find out more information on the website of Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance. Website Address: freedomfchs.com
WHAT IS ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS, GANG STALKING, MIND CONTROL AND V2K (Voice to Skull)There are many scientific explanations of what this technology can do, I wanted to give you a simple explanation. I contacted Timothy White - in New York City, New York - Telecommunications Engineer and cognitive countermeasures' researcher to get an explanation anyone could understand and he stated the following:"Thousands of ordinary U.S. citizens have become non-consensual victims of extreme low frequency neurobiological experimentation designed for the development of weapons systems that can monitor, control and change the brain-wave activity of the average citizen. We (Tim is also a victim) are victims of a technological arms race for the remote control of the mind.The perpetrators of these crimes range from rogue elements of every level of government to corporations to private citizens. There are thousands of targeted victims across the country and the globe.
SOME OF THE WAYS YOU ARE TORTURED AND TORMENTED ARE AS FOLLOWS:The torture consist of body overheating, body extremely cold, seizures, heart pain, ear aches, itching behind eyes, burning behind eyes, targeting pain to individual parts of the body, swelling, headaches, hair coming out by the handfuls as if you have had chemotherapy, mind paralyses, being hypnotized or placed in a trance type state, being tracked through your body like an animal, etc., and can lead to undetectable death from heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms, etc.They also use sleep deprivation and constant harassment which makes it easier for the corrupt official to use mind control. V2K (voice to skull) and hologram type hallucinations are used to make the person appear to have a mental problem. They also induce sexual stimulation in the person and some have stated they may have been raped. The mind control can make a victim commit suicide and even commit murder. All electrical appliances are destroyed and car radios and even engines are destroyed. Cars are run off of the road and you are stalked and attacked constantly. All mail is intercepted (even registered, certified and express mail), birth certificates are changed and social security records are manipulated. Debts are increased, and jobs and businesses are destroyed. You are monitored and/or tracked by Drones (airborne cameras), satellites, and illegal audio and video in your home.All the time that this and more is happening to you, usually simultaneously, everyone is told that you have a mental problem or that you are under investigation.Washington has not given permission for any official on any level to commit these acts.
WHO ARE THE VICTIMS AND HOW WERE THEY CHOSEN?Though some victims are chosen randomly. Some of us have discovered that if we filed a complaint with a company, corrupt official, etc. we could become "Targeted." For example: Someone became targeted as a result of filing a complaint against a law firm. Another person became targeted because she filed against a dental office.We have also discovered that victims are all over the world national and international.
HOW DID I BECOME A VICTIM OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS AND GANG STALKING?I think I was chosen for the following reasons:1) My grandchildren were illegally taken by the state for federal funding and also because my younger grandchild (who had a problem with his intestines at the time) was being beaten and made to go without food in the foster home of Sherrika White. He was also tied to a tree. My older grandchild was putting food in his pockets to feed the younger grandchild. To cover up the crime the children were illegally placed for adoption by the state (Sky Tanghe and Mike Hartlage) and Judge Jerry Bowles (who was allowed to sit on the bench eventhough he had a problem with alcohol). The children were illegally adopted by a social worker (which is a conflict of interest) and placed on numerous drugs, (adderal, resperdal, topomax, depakote, amphetamine salts, etc.) and were taking approximately nine (9) pills per day.2) I have a cd from a forensic analyst of my coworkers, (Mark Yates, Will Beard and Wilma Wilke) discussing killing me and taking me to the KKK. They also discussed a woman that Mark Yates handcuffed in a building. Mark Yates is also discussing a list that I have been placed on and once you get put on this list all the money in the world won't save me, if they want you, you're gone. He also recruited for this at Blue Grass Automotive and I overheard him state, "This thing is bigger than the KKK, everybody is in this thing" Mark said his uncle is in it and he is a big time (some kind of official) in an office. He further stated, judges, policeman, doctors everybody is in this thing.I was also assaulted three (3) times by Tyler Stone and went to the hospital twice (once by ambulance). I also had bugs thrown in my hair. I also had to deal with Andy Vine (one of the owners) perverted email. I did not receive any assistance from the offices in Kentucky, which includes the FBI, EEOC, the Police, everything was covered up. I filed complaints against all of the above.3) Rev. Coleman (now deceased), Elizabeth Elliott, Daniel and Pena Cobble, Rose Perry, Russell Wickliffe and Vicki Page and I filed a class action lawsuit against several Federal Judges in Louisville, Kentucky. The reason the lawsuit was filed is because cases were being dismissed without any discovery, people that qualified for forma pauperis were not being allowed forma pauperis, cases were being signed by clerks and they would refuse to say who the judges on the cases were, cases are supposed to be assigned by the computer randomly however the same judges - mainly Judge Heyburn and Judge Simpson - would always get the cases, etc.I am still fighting all of the above issues.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)