I HAVE SEEN THIS PATTERN REPEAT ITSELF OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS.
WHENEVER I DRIVE A CHINESE DRIVER IN A COROLLA WILL DRIVE VERY SLOWLY IN FRONT OF ME. WHEN A DRIVER TURNS OFF ANOTHER WILL PULL IN FRONT OF ME AND SLOW AND PROCEDE TO DRIVE VERY SLOWLY -UNDER THE SPEED LIMIT.
THIS HAPPENS ON THE HIGHWAY AS WELL.
Example: yesterday I went to a Hindu temple to hear an American Hindu speak - as I pulled out of the parking lot a Chinese couple driving a blue Corolla immediately pulled ahead of me from a virtually empty lane. He then slowed down to about 50km. The same would happen on the highway - cars would cut in front of me and slow down - 80% of these would be Chinese and Muslim drivers.
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
COVERT EXPERIMENTATION AND COVER UPS
http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12177&page=185
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
.cal care, ethics, education, and health-related human rights for all people. Otmar Kloiber, WMA secretary general, reported on inquiry7,8 that:
the World Medical Association entrusts it completely to its members to implement and monitor the implementation of WMA policy. The office of the WMA has neither the means nor the task to investigate the application in the countries. With the Declaration of Helsinki the implementation has been fairly successful but yet we don’t have reliable country data. For a country such as Iran we simply don’t know.
That implies that although the DoH has international authority, it is not known how well it is respected or even enforced across the globe. Dr. Kloiber continued: “A very strong role lies in the hand of the publishers of international professional journals. Requirements to give proof of the observation of the DoH certainly help to get those standards accepted.”
That last remark shows that overt research that is submitted for publication to (ideally) peer-reviewed professional journals must meet the highest standards of human research-subject protection as exemplified by the DoH and the CIOMS guidelines. Covert or classified military research findings will probably not be submitted for publication in the international literature, so they will escape the attention of publishers and peer reviewers. Thus, human-subjects protection in this sector of biomedical research cannot be guaranteed or assessed. Military use of advances in biomedical science is extremely difficult to investigate, because of the classified status of most such research. To safeguard their national security, nations that are actively pursuing biotechnology useful to the military are highly unlikely to advertise their accomplishments in the biomedical literature or elsewhere. Moreover, an inverse relationship seems apparent: countries that are most likely to be pursuing neuroscientific and other biotechnological developments for military or intelligence use are least likely to be direct or transparent about such activities.
The international community is concerned about the reactivation of the nuclear program in Iran. The recent visit of the Iranian president to the UN in New York has not relieved any of the fears associated with Iran’s development of nuclear power (Hoge, 2007). And the development of other forms of military technologies, such as neurotechnological devices, to build Iran’s national defense and perhaps even offense remains largely unknown. It poses a threat to international stability, and we are compelled to learn more about ethical regulations for biomedical research in Iran.
7
For this report, representatives of WMA, CIOMS, and the International Association for Bioethics were approached with specific questions about the scope of and international compliance with their guidelines. Only WMA responded to the committee’s request.
8
Otmar Kloiber, WMA, personal communication to committee member Jonathan Moreno on September 18, 2007.
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
.cal care, ethics, education, and health-related human rights for all people. Otmar Kloiber, WMA secretary general, reported on inquiry7,8 that:
the World Medical Association entrusts it completely to its members to implement and monitor the implementation of WMA policy. The office of the WMA has neither the means nor the task to investigate the application in the countries. With the Declaration of Helsinki the implementation has been fairly successful but yet we don’t have reliable country data. For a country such as Iran we simply don’t know.
That implies that although the DoH has international authority, it is not known how well it is respected or even enforced across the globe. Dr. Kloiber continued: “A very strong role lies in the hand of the publishers of international professional journals. Requirements to give proof of the observation of the DoH certainly help to get those standards accepted.”
That last remark shows that overt research that is submitted for publication to (ideally) peer-reviewed professional journals must meet the highest standards of human research-subject protection as exemplified by the DoH and the CIOMS guidelines. Covert or classified military research findings will probably not be submitted for publication in the international literature, so they will escape the attention of publishers and peer reviewers. Thus, human-subjects protection in this sector of biomedical research cannot be guaranteed or assessed. Military use of advances in biomedical science is extremely difficult to investigate, because of the classified status of most such research. To safeguard their national security, nations that are actively pursuing biotechnology useful to the military are highly unlikely to advertise their accomplishments in the biomedical literature or elsewhere. Moreover, an inverse relationship seems apparent: countries that are most likely to be pursuing neuroscientific and other biotechnological developments for military or intelligence use are least likely to be direct or transparent about such activities.
The international community is concerned about the reactivation of the nuclear program in Iran. The recent visit of the Iranian president to the UN in New York has not relieved any of the fears associated with Iran’s development of nuclear power (Hoge, 2007). And the development of other forms of military technologies, such as neurotechnological devices, to build Iran’s national defense and perhaps even offense remains largely unknown. It poses a threat to international stability, and we are compelled to learn more about ethical regulations for biomedical research in Iran.
7
For this report, representatives of WMA, CIOMS, and the International Association for Bioethics were approached with specific questions about the scope of and international compliance with their guidelines. Only WMA responded to the committee’s request.
8
Otmar Kloiber, WMA, personal communication to committee member Jonathan Moreno on September 18, 2007.
IF IT WAS DONE THEN IT COULD BE DONE NOW!!!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/7415082/French-bread-spiked-with-LSD-in-CIA-experiment.html
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
French bread spiked with LSD in CIA experiment
A 50-year mystery over the 'cursed bread' of Pont-Saint-Esprit, which left residents suffering hallucinations, has been solved after a writer discovered the US had spiked the bread with LSD as part of an experiment
In 1951, a quiet, picturesque village in southern France was suddenly and mysteriously struck down with mass insanity and hallucinations. At least five people died, dozens were interned in asylums and hundreds afflicted.
For decades it was assumed that the local bread had been unwittingly poisoned with a psychedelic mould. Now, however, an American investigative journalist has uncovered evidence suggesting the CIA peppered local food with the hallucinogenic drug LSD as part of a mind control experiment at the height of the Cold War.
The mystery of Le Pain Maudit (Cursed Bread) still haunts the inhabitants of Pont-Saint-Esprit, in the Gard, southeast France.
On August 16, 1951, the inhabitants were suddenly racked with frightful hallucinations of terrifying beasts and fire.
One man tried to drown himself, screaming that his belly was being eaten by snakes. An 11-year-old tried to strangle his grandmother. Another man shouted: "I am a plane", before jumping out of a second-floor window, breaking his legs. He then got up and carried on for 50 yards. Another saw his heart escaping through his feet and begged a doctor to put it back. Many were taken to the local asylum in strait jackets.
Time magazine wrote at the time: "Among the stricken, delirium rose: patients thrashed wildly on their beds, screaming that red flowers were blossoming from their bodies, that their heads had turned to molten lead."
Eventually, it was determined that the best-known local baker had unwittingly contaminated his flour with ergot, a hallucinogenic mould that infects rye grain. Another theory was the bread had been poisoned with organic mercury.
However, H P Albarelli Jr., an investigative journalist, claims the outbreak resulted from a covert experiment directed by the CIA and the US Army's top-secret Special Operations Division (SOD) at Fort Detrick, Maryland.
The scientists who produced both alternative explanations, he writes, worked for the Swiss-based Sandoz Pharmaceutical Company, which was then secretly supplying both the Army and CIA with LSD.
Mr Albarelli came across CIA documents while investigating the suspicious suicide of Frank Olson, a biochemist working for the SOD who fell from a 13th floor window two years after the Cursed Bread incident. One note transcribes a conversation between a CIA agent and a Sandoz official who mentions the "secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit" and explains that it was not "at all" caused by mould but by diethylamide, the D in LSD.
While compiling his book, A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA's Secret Cold War Experiments, Mr Albarelli spoke to former colleagues of Mr Olson, two of whom told him that the Pont-Saint-Esprit incident was part of a mind control experiment run by the CIA and US army.
After the Korean War the Americans launched a vast research programme into the mental manipulation of prisoners and enemy troops.
Scientists at Fort Detrick told him that agents had sprayed LSD into the air and also contaminated "local foot products".
Mr Albarelli said the real "smoking gun" was a White House document sent to members of the Rockefeller Commission formed in 1975 to investigate CIA abuses. It contained the names of a number of French nationals who had been secretly employed by the CIA and made direct reference to the "Pont St. Esprit incident." In its quest to research LSD as an offensive weapon, Mr Albarelli claims, the US army also drugged over 5,700 unwitting American servicemen between 1953 and 1965.
None of his sources would indicate whether the French secret services were aware of the alleged operation. According to US news reports, French intelligence chiefs have demanded the CIA explain itself following the book's revelations. French intelligence officially denies this.
Locals in Pont-Saint-Esprit still want to know why they were hit by such apocalyptic scenes. "At the time people brought up the theory of an experiment aimed at controlling a popular revolt," said Charles Granjoh, 71.
"I almost kicked the bucket," he told the weekly French magazine Les Inrockuptibles. "I'd like to know why."
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
French bread spiked with LSD in CIA experiment
A 50-year mystery over the 'cursed bread' of Pont-Saint-Esprit, which left residents suffering hallucinations, has been solved after a writer discovered the US had spiked the bread with LSD as part of an experiment
In 1951, a quiet, picturesque village in southern France was suddenly and mysteriously struck down with mass insanity and hallucinations. At least five people died, dozens were interned in asylums and hundreds afflicted.
For decades it was assumed that the local bread had been unwittingly poisoned with a psychedelic mould. Now, however, an American investigative journalist has uncovered evidence suggesting the CIA peppered local food with the hallucinogenic drug LSD as part of a mind control experiment at the height of the Cold War.
The mystery of Le Pain Maudit (Cursed Bread) still haunts the inhabitants of Pont-Saint-Esprit, in the Gard, southeast France.
On August 16, 1951, the inhabitants were suddenly racked with frightful hallucinations of terrifying beasts and fire.
One man tried to drown himself, screaming that his belly was being eaten by snakes. An 11-year-old tried to strangle his grandmother. Another man shouted: "I am a plane", before jumping out of a second-floor window, breaking his legs. He then got up and carried on for 50 yards. Another saw his heart escaping through his feet and begged a doctor to put it back. Many were taken to the local asylum in strait jackets.
Time magazine wrote at the time: "Among the stricken, delirium rose: patients thrashed wildly on their beds, screaming that red flowers were blossoming from their bodies, that their heads had turned to molten lead."
Eventually, it was determined that the best-known local baker had unwittingly contaminated his flour with ergot, a hallucinogenic mould that infects rye grain. Another theory was the bread had been poisoned with organic mercury.
However, H P Albarelli Jr., an investigative journalist, claims the outbreak resulted from a covert experiment directed by the CIA and the US Army's top-secret Special Operations Division (SOD) at Fort Detrick, Maryland.
The scientists who produced both alternative explanations, he writes, worked for the Swiss-based Sandoz Pharmaceutical Company, which was then secretly supplying both the Army and CIA with LSD.
Mr Albarelli came across CIA documents while investigating the suspicious suicide of Frank Olson, a biochemist working for the SOD who fell from a 13th floor window two years after the Cursed Bread incident. One note transcribes a conversation between a CIA agent and a Sandoz official who mentions the "secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit" and explains that it was not "at all" caused by mould but by diethylamide, the D in LSD.
While compiling his book, A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA's Secret Cold War Experiments, Mr Albarelli spoke to former colleagues of Mr Olson, two of whom told him that the Pont-Saint-Esprit incident was part of a mind control experiment run by the CIA and US army.
After the Korean War the Americans launched a vast research programme into the mental manipulation of prisoners and enemy troops.
Scientists at Fort Detrick told him that agents had sprayed LSD into the air and also contaminated "local foot products".
Mr Albarelli said the real "smoking gun" was a White House document sent to members of the Rockefeller Commission formed in 1975 to investigate CIA abuses. It contained the names of a number of French nationals who had been secretly employed by the CIA and made direct reference to the "Pont St. Esprit incident." In its quest to research LSD as an offensive weapon, Mr Albarelli claims, the US army also drugged over 5,700 unwitting American servicemen between 1953 and 1965.
None of his sources would indicate whether the French secret services were aware of the alleged operation. According to US news reports, French intelligence chiefs have demanded the CIA explain itself following the book's revelations. French intelligence officially denies this.
Locals in Pont-Saint-Esprit still want to know why they were hit by such apocalyptic scenes. "At the time people brought up the theory of an experiment aimed at controlling a popular revolt," said Charles Granjoh, 71.
"I almost kicked the bucket," he told the weekly French magazine Les Inrockuptibles. "I'd like to know why."
TECHNOLOGIES USED TO HARASS CITIZENS IN HOME
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/gang-stalking-and-directed-energy-weapons-torture-part-six
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Gang Stalking and Directed Energy Weapons Torture - Part Six
Share: by badexperiment August 18, 2009 at 07:13 pm
309 views 0 Recommendations 3 comments
Chapter 5: New X-Ray Surveillance Tools Part III
Have manufacturers responded to law enforcement’s demand for through-the-wall surveillance tools?
The unit pictured on the left is manufactured by Time Domain Corporation. It is RadarVision, an Ultrawideband, through-the-wall surveillance tool produced in response to the call for Homeland Security technology. It is marketed primarily to law enforcement agencies with the stated capability to track humans through “reinforced concrete, concrete block, sheetrock, brick, wood, plastic, tile, and fiberglass” Time Domain Corporation is the company awarded a Federal contract for business solicitation BAA-99-04-IFKPA -Through the Wall Surveillance.
A noteworthy capability of RadarVision is “real-time intelligence on the direction and distance to the motion contact.” In other words, it can precisely measure distance to a human target through-the-wall. That opens up the possibility of precisely and remotely targeting humans through the walls of their apartments or homes. Please take note, as that capability is relevant to the harassment experienced by victims of through-the-wall directed energy weapons (DEWs).
What is Ultrawideband? Ultrawideband is an old radio wave technology first used for Morse-code radio transmitters pioneered by Guglielmo Marconi in 1901. Ultrawideband (UWB) has been used in recent years for ground-penetrating radar and other applications to inspect roads, bridges and other large construction areas for structural integrity. It has seen a renewed popularity of late as a conductor of wireless computer network transmissions. The use of Ultrawideband is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Time Domain Corporation required and received FCC approval to sell RadarVision commercially to law enforcement agencies
Were they right?The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) as far back as 1996 provided a warning regarding this class of X-Ray technology that now seems prophetic. “I’m familiar with the millimeter-wave technology and it’s an incredible invasion of privacy,” says Don Haines, a lobbyist for the American Civil Liberties Union. “It produces a virtual 3-D image, and you can see the contours of breasts, buttocks and genitals.”
The Point is this . . .Clearly, evidence is overwhelming that through-the-wall imaging technology is being manufactured by a number of government suppliers. And, that technology is sought and purchased by law enforcement agencies. We have also demonstrated that this x-ray technology has the following capabilities:
The ability to see through walls, and most common construction materials.
It can generate detailed through-the-clothing images of individuals in the room or home under surveillance.
The units can be operated remotely from a nearby home or apartment.
The units can track movement, and monitor speech, heartbeat, pulse, and other bodily functions remotely.
The units can provide precise distance measurements for targeting individuals under surveillance with weapons.
The units are portable, silent, and can be disguised or hidden in a typical residential home or apartment
We ask that you take note of the capability highlighted in red above–the ability to accurately target individuals under surveillance with weapons. The following question must now be answered: What class of through-the-wall weapons and torture devices are being used in concert with remote x-ray technology? That will be discussed in the next installment: Weapons. Return soon, you don’t want to miss it!
Additional Reading:Millimeter Wave Imaging at Airports
Presentation of through-the-wall technology to the Federal Law Enforcement Wireless User Group July, 11, 2000Royal Military College of Canada study of Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technologies from American ManufacturersTime Domain Corp. UWB Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technology WebsiteAir Force Material Command article on development of Through-the-Wall technology for civilian law enforcementRadarvision PDF Brochure
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Gang Stalking and Directed Energy Weapons Torture - Part Six
Share: by badexperiment August 18, 2009 at 07:13 pm
309 views 0 Recommendations 3 comments
Chapter 5: New X-Ray Surveillance Tools Part III
Have manufacturers responded to law enforcement’s demand for through-the-wall surveillance tools?
The unit pictured on the left is manufactured by Time Domain Corporation. It is RadarVision, an Ultrawideband, through-the-wall surveillance tool produced in response to the call for Homeland Security technology. It is marketed primarily to law enforcement agencies with the stated capability to track humans through “reinforced concrete, concrete block, sheetrock, brick, wood, plastic, tile, and fiberglass” Time Domain Corporation is the company awarded a Federal contract for business solicitation BAA-99-04-IFKPA -Through the Wall Surveillance.
A noteworthy capability of RadarVision is “real-time intelligence on the direction and distance to the motion contact.” In other words, it can precisely measure distance to a human target through-the-wall. That opens up the possibility of precisely and remotely targeting humans through the walls of their apartments or homes. Please take note, as that capability is relevant to the harassment experienced by victims of through-the-wall directed energy weapons (DEWs).
What is Ultrawideband? Ultrawideband is an old radio wave technology first used for Morse-code radio transmitters pioneered by Guglielmo Marconi in 1901. Ultrawideband (UWB) has been used in recent years for ground-penetrating radar and other applications to inspect roads, bridges and other large construction areas for structural integrity. It has seen a renewed popularity of late as a conductor of wireless computer network transmissions. The use of Ultrawideband is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Time Domain Corporation required and received FCC approval to sell RadarVision commercially to law enforcement agencies
Were they right?The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) as far back as 1996 provided a warning regarding this class of X-Ray technology that now seems prophetic. “I’m familiar with the millimeter-wave technology and it’s an incredible invasion of privacy,” says Don Haines, a lobbyist for the American Civil Liberties Union. “It produces a virtual 3-D image, and you can see the contours of breasts, buttocks and genitals.”
The Point is this . . .Clearly, evidence is overwhelming that through-the-wall imaging technology is being manufactured by a number of government suppliers. And, that technology is sought and purchased by law enforcement agencies. We have also demonstrated that this x-ray technology has the following capabilities:
The ability to see through walls, and most common construction materials.
It can generate detailed through-the-clothing images of individuals in the room or home under surveillance.
The units can be operated remotely from a nearby home or apartment.
The units can track movement, and monitor speech, heartbeat, pulse, and other bodily functions remotely.
The units can provide precise distance measurements for targeting individuals under surveillance with weapons.
The units are portable, silent, and can be disguised or hidden in a typical residential home or apartment
We ask that you take note of the capability highlighted in red above–the ability to accurately target individuals under surveillance with weapons. The following question must now be answered: What class of through-the-wall weapons and torture devices are being used in concert with remote x-ray technology? That will be discussed in the next installment: Weapons. Return soon, you don’t want to miss it!
Additional Reading:Millimeter Wave Imaging at Airports
Presentation of through-the-wall technology to the Federal Law Enforcement Wireless User Group July, 11, 2000Royal Military College of Canada study of Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technologies from American ManufacturersTime Domain Corp. UWB Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technology WebsiteAir Force Material Command article on development of Through-the-Wall technology for civilian law enforcementRadarvision PDF Brochure
WENT TO A VEDIC TEMPLE TO DO YOGA, AND...
At the very narrow entrance way two women stood on the opposite sides - as I was about to pass, one crossed in front of me, brushing up against me.
After the yoga class, on the way out, on one side of the same passageway, was a 24 case of water bottles and on the otherside was an Indian man just standing in the way, with the case of water blocking half the passage way. THERE WAS NO CONCEIVABLE REASON FOR THE WATER TO BE THERE.
ps as I am typing this my left ear is burning and hurting and so is my left back and arms.
SEE RADIATION USED AS A REMOTE HARASSMENT TOOL:
http://www.youtube.com/user/MsEYEOPENER
After the yoga class, on the way out, on one side of the same passageway, was a 24 case of water bottles and on the otherside was an Indian man just standing in the way, with the case of water blocking half the passage way. THERE WAS NO CONCEIVABLE REASON FOR THE WATER TO BE THERE.
ps as I am typing this my left ear is burning and hurting and so is my left back and arms.
SEE RADIATION USED AS A REMOTE HARASSMENT TOOL:
http://www.youtube.com/user/MsEYEOPENER
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
ICE COOLERS AND PLASTIC BAGS ALWAYS AROUND....
INTERESTINGLY, THE ACTIONS RECENTLY IN THE NEWS OF A PERSON TAKING OFF HIS JACKET, BLUE LUNCH COOLERS,PLASTIC BAGS AND PINK COLORED ITEMS ARE ALWAY AROUND IN MY ENVIRONMENT - WHAT IS SO UNUSUAL ABOUT THESE INCIDENTS????
I HAVE READ OF CERTAIN ITEMS BEING USED AS TRIGGERS IN MIND GAMES - COULD THESE BE SOME OF THEM???
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Anchoring
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_harassment#Links
WWW.FREEDOMFCHS.COM
I HAVE READ OF CERTAIN ITEMS BEING USED AS TRIGGERS IN MIND GAMES - COULD THESE BE SOME OF THEM???
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Anchoring
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_harassment#Links
WWW.FREEDOMFCHS.COM
HELP, MY COINS ARE GONE!!!!
I HAD A COOKIE PAN (A BIG ONE) FILLED WITH LOONIES, TOONIES, AND ALL KINDS OF COINS. I LIFTED IT TODAY AND FOUND IT VERY LIGHT - UPON OPENING IT I FOUND IT ALL BUT EMPTY.
INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, THE SAME HAPPENS WITH ALL THE CONTAINERS OF BEANS AND RICE I HAVE IN MY PANTRY.
INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, THE SAME HAPPENS WITH ALL THE CONTAINERS OF BEANS AND RICE I HAVE IN MY PANTRY.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
THIRD PARTY STALKING IS AGAINST THE LAW
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004386888_apwascowthirdpartystalking3rdldwritethru.html
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Washington high court: Stalking by third parties is a crime
By RACHEL LA CORTE
Associated Press Writer
A man who recruited his friends to follow an ex-girlfriend and file written reports about her activities was correctly convicted of stalking, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
In a 6-3 decision, the high court reinstated the conviction of Andre Paul Becklin, who was convicted in Ferry County Superior Court of using several friends to follow his ex-girlfriend, Mary Alison McGee. Becklin was sentenced to a year in prison, but his conviction was overturned by the state Court of Appeals.
The Supreme Court's majority, led by Justice Bobbe Bridge, said Thursday that the definition of stalking "is broad enough to encompass the act of directing third parties to follow and intimidate a victim."
Bridge was joined by Justices Susan Owens, Mary Fairhurst, Barbara Madsen, James Johnson and Tom Chambers.
Mike Sandona, the Ferry County prosecutor, said the court's ruling was important.
"It stops people like Mr. Becklin, who has friends do the things he can't do, disturb the peace of his ex," he said. "It's is an issue of fear and control over another person."
Becklin and McGee started dating in 1996, but according to court records, Becklin made threats to kill her and attacked her when she refused to get an abortion after becoming pregnant with their son.
McGee eventually left Becklin and married another man, before which Becklin briefly took their son without McGee's consent and tried to force his way into her home, according to court documents.
McGee got a protection order in December 2003, barring Becklin from having any contact with her or from coming within 100 feet of her or her home. The order also prohibited contact through third parties.
Becklin was arrested on April 1, 2004 and charged with stalking McGee after she said Becklin's friends repeatedly drove Becklin's cars by her house, circling her block several times. Friends would also fill out written reports for Becklin recounting their sightings of McGee around town.
Dissenters, led by Chief Justice Gerry Alexander, took issue with what they said were inadequate jury instructions that ultimately led to Becklin's conviction.
During closing arguments, both sides addressed the issue of whether Becklin should be held accountable for the actions of his friends, but instructions to the jury did not include any guidance on accomplice liability or the concept that a third party's actions could support criminal accountability for stalking.
After it began deliberations, the jury sent a note to the judge, asking if a third party was included in stalking and whether a person could be stalked through a third party.
The judge answered yes, and the jury convicted Becklin.
"Although one may be culpable for the acts of others through Washington's complicity statute if he or she causes an innocent person or persons to engage in criminal conduct or is an accomplice of the person committing the unlawful acts, the jury should receive an instruction" based on the state statutes, Alexander wrote, joined by Justices Charles Johnson and Richard Sanders.
Becklin's attorney, Anthony Castelda, could not be reached for comment.
---
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
Washington high court: Stalking by third parties is a crime
By RACHEL LA CORTE
Associated Press Writer
A man who recruited his friends to follow an ex-girlfriend and file written reports about her activities was correctly convicted of stalking, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
In a 6-3 decision, the high court reinstated the conviction of Andre Paul Becklin, who was convicted in Ferry County Superior Court of using several friends to follow his ex-girlfriend, Mary Alison McGee. Becklin was sentenced to a year in prison, but his conviction was overturned by the state Court of Appeals.
The Supreme Court's majority, led by Justice Bobbe Bridge, said Thursday that the definition of stalking "is broad enough to encompass the act of directing third parties to follow and intimidate a victim."
Bridge was joined by Justices Susan Owens, Mary Fairhurst, Barbara Madsen, James Johnson and Tom Chambers.
Mike Sandona, the Ferry County prosecutor, said the court's ruling was important.
"It stops people like Mr. Becklin, who has friends do the things he can't do, disturb the peace of his ex," he said. "It's is an issue of fear and control over another person."
Becklin and McGee started dating in 1996, but according to court records, Becklin made threats to kill her and attacked her when she refused to get an abortion after becoming pregnant with their son.
McGee eventually left Becklin and married another man, before which Becklin briefly took their son without McGee's consent and tried to force his way into her home, according to court documents.
McGee got a protection order in December 2003, barring Becklin from having any contact with her or from coming within 100 feet of her or her home. The order also prohibited contact through third parties.
Becklin was arrested on April 1, 2004 and charged with stalking McGee after she said Becklin's friends repeatedly drove Becklin's cars by her house, circling her block several times. Friends would also fill out written reports for Becklin recounting their sightings of McGee around town.
Dissenters, led by Chief Justice Gerry Alexander, took issue with what they said were inadequate jury instructions that ultimately led to Becklin's conviction.
During closing arguments, both sides addressed the issue of whether Becklin should be held accountable for the actions of his friends, but instructions to the jury did not include any guidance on accomplice liability or the concept that a third party's actions could support criminal accountability for stalking.
After it began deliberations, the jury sent a note to the judge, asking if a third party was included in stalking and whether a person could be stalked through a third party.
The judge answered yes, and the jury convicted Becklin.
"Although one may be culpable for the acts of others through Washington's complicity statute if he or she causes an innocent person or persons to engage in criminal conduct or is an accomplice of the person committing the unlawful acts, the jury should receive an instruction" based on the state statutes, Alexander wrote, joined by Justices Charles Johnson and Richard Sanders.
Becklin's attorney, Anthony Castelda, could not be reached for comment.
---
THE PATTERN OF MY BECOMING ILL...
http://www.youtube.com/user/MsEYEOPENER
EACH TIME I TALK OR WRITE ABOUT GANG STALKING AND MICROWAVE HARASSMENT IN GET REALLY SICK - MIGRAINES, FLU LIKE SYMPTOMS, STOMACH CRAMPS ETC.
EACH TIME I TRY WORKING - IT GET REALLY SICK
EACH TIME I TRY DOING ANYTHING CONSTRUCTIVE, I GET REALLY SICK WITH THE SYMPTOMS MENTIONED ABOVE.
NOW SEE THIS SITE:
http://www.freedomfchs.com/id29.html
EACH TIME I TALK OR WRITE ABOUT GANG STALKING AND MICROWAVE HARASSMENT IN GET REALLY SICK - MIGRAINES, FLU LIKE SYMPTOMS, STOMACH CRAMPS ETC.
EACH TIME I TRY WORKING - IT GET REALLY SICK
EACH TIME I TRY DOING ANYTHING CONSTRUCTIVE, I GET REALLY SICK WITH THE SYMPTOMS MENTIONED ABOVE.
NOW SEE THIS SITE:
http://www.freedomfchs.com/id29.html
I JUST UPLOADED THE LAST VIDEO ON THE BLOG AND MY ...
THE MICROWAVE DETECTOR IS GOING CRAZY BESIDE ME AND THE RIGHT NOSTRILS IS PULSING IN PAIN AS WELL AS THE RIGHT EYE - THE PULSING IS SAME FREQUENCY AS THE PULSING IN THE MICROWAVE DETECTOR BESIDE ME.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=SetYouFreee#p/c/D0D5EBB0CEC05490/0/cc1nhE6TsUI
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=SetYouFreee#p/c/D0D5EBB0CEC05490/0/cc1nhE6TsUI
Court Recognizes Electronic Harassment:Protection Order for James Walbert
http://www.raven1.net/walbert.htm
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
December 30, 2008
This could be the first official recognition of the need to protect citizens against electronic harassment. The following are comments from Julianne McKinney regarding the posted page scans:
This is actually very impressive. Walbert persuaded the Court that the defendant was using electronic weapons against him and his family, in addition to resorting to obvious forms of stalking.
He substantiated his claim with DoD documentation and had the support of a security specialist, who proved that electronic frequencies were involved, and, it would appear, the support of a couple of police officers. He also made use of letters from Missouri Representative, Jim Guest.
The outcome: The defendant failed to show up in court. The defendant has to pay all legal fees. The defendant may not employ 3rd-party means of re-establishing contact with Walbert (which would constitute multiple stalking), and may not employ any form of "electronic means" in harassing Walbert.
Walbert filed his complaint on November 25, 2008. The court decided the case on December 30, 2008.
Although this will probably not protect Walbert in the long term, he has obtained the first court-based acknowledgement of the existence of electronic weapons and of electronic harassment, that I know of.
Click each scanned image below for the court papers:
walbert1.jpg
walbert2.jpg
walbert3.jpg
walbert4.jpg
walbert5.jpg
walbert6.jpg
walbert7.jpg
walbert8.jpg
walbert9.jpg
walbert10.jpg
Way to go, James!
EXCERPTED FROM ABOVE LINK:
December 30, 2008
This could be the first official recognition of the need to protect citizens against electronic harassment. The following are comments from Julianne McKinney regarding the posted page scans:
This is actually very impressive. Walbert persuaded the Court that the defendant was using electronic weapons against him and his family, in addition to resorting to obvious forms of stalking.
He substantiated his claim with DoD documentation and had the support of a security specialist, who proved that electronic frequencies were involved, and, it would appear, the support of a couple of police officers. He also made use of letters from Missouri Representative, Jim Guest.
The outcome: The defendant failed to show up in court. The defendant has to pay all legal fees. The defendant may not employ 3rd-party means of re-establishing contact with Walbert (which would constitute multiple stalking), and may not employ any form of "electronic means" in harassing Walbert.
Walbert filed his complaint on November 25, 2008. The court decided the case on December 30, 2008.
Although this will probably not protect Walbert in the long term, he has obtained the first court-based acknowledgement of the existence of electronic weapons and of electronic harassment, that I know of.
Click each scanned image below for the court papers:
walbert1.jpg
walbert2.jpg
walbert3.jpg
walbert4.jpg
walbert5.jpg
walbert6.jpg
walbert7.jpg
walbert8.jpg
walbert9.jpg
walbert10.jpg
Way to go, James!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)